Medical Information Only. Consult your healthcare provider before considering clinical trial enrollment.

2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Diabetic Foot

Open-data reference.

31 US clinical trials · 14 currently recruiting

Active & Recent Trials

RECRUITING 300,000 participants

A Real-World Registry of Chronic Wounds and Ulcers

U.S. Wound Registry

NCT02280733

RECRUITING 5,000 participants

DFC 004 Biomarkers for Active Diabetic Foot Ulcers

University of Michigan

NCT06104969

RECRUITING NA 800 participants

Effectiveness of Remote Foot Temperature Monitoring

VA Office of Research and Development

NCT05728411

RECRUITING Phase 4 650 participants

Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Human Placental Membrane Products and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers

BioLab Holdings

NCT07089602

RECRUITING 405 participants

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) Biofilm Infection and Recurrence

University of Pittsburgh

NCT05172089

RECRUITING Phase 4 340 participants

Evaluating Several Cellular, Acellular, and Matrix-like Products (CAMPs) and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot and Venous Leg Ulcers.

Tiger Biosciences

NCT06826339

RECRUITING NA 272 participants

Modified Platform Trial Assessing Multiple CAMPs and SOC vs SOC Alone in the Treatment of Hard-to-Heal DFUs

StimLabs

NCT06449638

RECRUITING NA 170 participants

Modified Platform Trial Evaluating PpLHACM and SOC Versus SOC Alone in the Treatment of Nonhealing DFUs

MiMedx Group

NCT06600724

RECRUITING NA 124 participants

Evaluating the Efficacy of a Single Layer Placental-based Allograft and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care

Applied Biologics

NCT06564831

RECRUITING NA 120 participants

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Remote Monitoring Program for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Johns Hopkins University

NCT05579743

RECRUITING NA 100 participants

Dehydrated Human Amnion Membrane and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Axolotl Biologix

NCT06550596

RECRUITING Phase 4 60 participants

A Multicenter, Prospective, Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of a Single Layer Placental-based Allograft and Standard of Care in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Applied Biologics

NCT07159282

RECRUITING NA 60 participants

Evaluating a Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Recurrence of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

University of Southern California

NCT06487780

RECRUITING NA 20 participants

Adapting Lifestyle Offloading for DFUs

University of Southern California

NCT06278935

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING NA 222 participants

A Unique Micro Water Jet Technology Device Versus Standard Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot

Medaxis

NCT04564443

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING NA 116 participants

CGM and DFU Healing Post-discharge

Emory University

NCT06054659

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING Phase 3 100 participants

SkinTE® for the Treatment of Wagner 1 Diabetic Foot Ulcers (COVER DFUS II)

PolarityTE

NCT06140303

ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING NA 72 participants

Non-healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers Treated With Standard Care With or Without BR-AM

BioStem Technologies

NCT06565156

COMPLETED 400 participants

Wound Assessment Using Spectral Imaging US

SpectralMD

NCT05415683

COMPLETED 331 participants

Thermal Screening for Early Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)

VisionQuest Biomedical

NCT03069729

COMPLETED NA 143 participants

Clinical Study Evaluating Symphony™ Versus Standard of Care in the Treatment of Non-Healing Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Aroa Biosurgery Limited

NCT06035536

COMPLETED Phase 2 140 participants

Cooling Leg and Foot Ulcer Skin Post Healing to Prevent Ulcer Recurrence

Medical University of South Carolina

NCT02626156

COMPLETED NA 119 participants

Safety and Efficacy of ActiGraft Pro Compared to Standard of Care in DFUs

RedDress

NCT04185558

COMPLETED NA 116 participants

Implementation of Telemedicine for Patient With Lower Extremity Wounds

University of California, Davis

NCT04440839

COMPLETED NA 108 participants

Matrion™ Decellularized Placental Membrane in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

LifeNet Health

NCT05087758

COMPLETED Phase 2 78 participants

Safety and Efficacy Study of DSC127 in Treating Subjects With Diabetic Ulcers

US Biotest

NCT00796744

COMPLETED 60 participants

Monitoring Physiologic Parameters in Individuals With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Orpyx Medical Technologies

NCT05613556

COMPLETED NA 49 participants

The Association Between Unprotected Standing, Walking and Wound Healing in Diabetes

University of Arizona

NCT02233179

COMPLETED NA 44 participants

Clinical Study Evaluating Wound Closure With Endoform™ and Symphony™

Aroa Biosurgery Limited

NCT06035523

COMPLETED Phase 1 15 participants

Study of Human Placenta-derived Cells (PDA002) to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness in Subjects With PAD and DFU

Celularity Incorporated

NCT01859117

COMPLETED 1 participants

Study of Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU)

GlaxoSmithKline

NCT03153007

Phase Distribution

PhaseTrial count
Early Phase 1 1
Phase 2 2
Phase 3 1
Phase 4 3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, National Library of Medicine. Data is informational only.

Reading the Diabetic Foot Trial Landscape

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 31 US studies indexed under Diabetic Foot, and 14 of those are currently open to recruitment — roughly 45% of the total volume on the registry. That ratio is a useful proxy for activity level: a high share of recruiting studies often signals that research interest is current and that new enrollment opportunities are appearing, while a low share typically means the field is dominated by completed or follow-up work where most participant spots have already been filled. These counts reflect the public registry only and include studies at every stage of design, so they should be read as an index of research attention rather than as a measure of treatment availability.

The phase distribution for Diabetic Foot shows 4 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) alongside 3 earlier-phase entries (Phase 1 through Phase 2). Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies focus on early safety signals, dosing, and preliminary effect, while Phase 3 studies are typically the larger efficacy and safety trials submitted toward regulatory review, and Phase 4 studies follow approved interventions in real-world use. A condition weighted toward later phases often reflects a mature research pipeline with several interventions already close to or past approval, whereas a heavier early-phase tilt suggests the field is still exploring new mechanisms and candidate approaches.

Top sponsor activity for Diabetic Foot is led by Aroa Biosurgery Limited with 2 indexed trials, alongside 9 other organizations in the top contributor list. The list on this page surfaces up to 31 of the most relevant recent and active entries, ordered with recruiting studies first so practical options are visible. All figures are derived from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset maintained by the National Library of Medicine and are reproduced here for reference. Inclusion of a trial, sponsor, or intervention on this page is neither an endorsement nor a recommendation — eligibility, protocol changes, and site-level status can shift frequently, so always verify current details on ClinicalTrials.gov and consult a qualified healthcare provider before acting on anything you see here.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many clinical trials are there for Diabetic Foot?

PlainTrial tracks 31 US clinical trials for Diabetic Foot, of which 14 are currently recruiting participants. Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov.

How do I find a recruiting trial for Diabetic Foot?

Use the trial list above filtered by "Recruiting" status, or visit our trial finder at /recruiting to search by condition and state. Always discuss trial participation with your healthcare provider before enrolling.

Is this data current?

Data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and reflects our most recent data pull. Trial status may have changed since then. Always verify current information at ClinicalTrials.gov before making decisions about participation.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (National Library of Medicine). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM) ClinicalTrials.gov AACT registry · 2024 Trial counts and statuses sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. Sponsor counts include both industry and federal/academic sponsors.

Verify with NIH →