Innovative Medical
Innovative Medical sponsors 44 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 43 completed. 41 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 0 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Cataracts, with 3 trials.
Trial Pipeline
44 total, page 1 of 1
Randomized Comparison of the Abbott WHITESTAR Signature System With Ellips Tranversal Ultrasound vs. the Alcon Infiniti With the Ozil Torsional Handpiece in Phacoemulsification: A Contralaterally-Controlled Trial
NCT01279031
Clear Corneal Incisions and Arcuate Incisions Utilizing FemtoSecond Laser Technology for Cataract Surgery
NCT01383057
Dispervise Ophthalmic Viscoelastic as an Agent to Ensure Watertight Wound Closure After Clear Corneal Cataract Incisions
NCT01298973
Laser Cataract Surgery With the Femtosecond Laser Technology
NCT01382823
Prospective Evaluation of Visual Outcomes With Tecnis One-Piece Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Compared With Patients Previously Implanted With Crystalens Aspheric Optic (AO)
NCT01191229
Evaluation of the Tecnis™ Multifocal and Crystalens™ Accommodating Intraocular Lenses
NCT01061281
Comparative Study of Photopic and Mesopic Distance, Intermediate and Near Visual Acuity, and Spectacle Independence
NCT01191502
A Clinical Evaluation Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Blink® Tears Lubricant Eye Drops for the Relief of Dry Eye Symptoms Following Implantation of Tecnis® Multifocal Introcular Lens
NCT01061268
Evaluation of Outcomes Using the AMO Advanced Customvue™ iLasik Procedure
NCT01061294
An Evaluation of Outcomes Following Wavefront Optimized or Wavefront Guided Lasik Procedure in Low to Moderate Myopic Patients
NCT01173198
An Open-Label Evaluation of Degree of Accommodation in Pseudophakic Patients Bilaterally Implanted With Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
NCT01004549
Evaluation Of Bilateral Tecnis Multifocal Versus ReSTOR 3D Intraocular Lenses
NCT01061918
Prospective Health Assessment of Cataract Patients' Ocular Surface
NCT01016405
Topical Cyclosporine and Disease Progression
NCT00567983
Objective Measurements of Prolonged Effects of Restasis on Dry Eye Disease
NCT00567177
An Evaluation of Kinerase Pro+Therapy Regimen Vs. Kinerase Vs. Control for the Treatment of Skin Aging
NCT00492479
Oasys vs. Extreme H20 Xtra 59
NCT00477763
Safety and Efficacy of Optive in Contact Lens Wearers With Dry Eyes
NCT00469573
Refractive Surgery and Optive Compatibility Study
NCT00469157
Aqueous Concentrations and PGE2 Inhibition of Ketorolac 0.4% vs. Bromfenac 0.09% in Cataract Patients: Trough Drug Effects
NCT00469690
Evaluation of the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Patient Acceptance of Dermatix Q for the Prevention and Management of Scars
NCT00450775
Efficacy and Safety of a New Multi-dose Lubricant Eye Drop Concomitant With Restasis® (Cyclosporine A) for the Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms
NCT00405457
Efficacy of Optive Versus Systane Concomitant With Restasis (Cyclosporine A) for the Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms
NCT00399061
Efficacy of Cyclosporine for the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms Following LASIK or Photorefractive Keratectomy
NCT00349440
Efficacy of Bimatoprost 0.03% in Patients Who Are Low-Responders to Latanoprost
NCT00347841
Ketorolac vs. Steroid in the Prevention of CME
NCT00348244
Comfort and Cleaning Evaluation of Multipurpose Solutions in Contact Lens Patients
NCT00519948
Bimatoprost Monotherapy vs. Dual Therapy With Travoprost and Timolol in Patients With Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension
NCT00348023
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine 0.05% in the Prevention of Ocular Surface Inflammation Secondary to Pterygia
NCT00383396
Pilot Evaluation of Two Multipurpose Solutions in Regards to Corneal Staining
NCT00483795
Comparison of Vitreous Levels of Acular LS 0.04%, Xibrom 0.09%, and Nevanac 0.1%
NCT00377546
Efficacy of Topical Ketorolac Versus Placebo for Improving Visual Outcomes Following Multifocal IOL Implantation
NCT00433225
Diurnal Curves With Bimatoprost 0.03% Versus Travoprost 0.004%
NCT00347802
Pilot Study Evaluation of 2 Artificial Tears. Evaluation of TBUT, Tear Meniscus Height and Tear Thickness
NCT00469521
Cross-Over Evaluation of Two Lubricating Eye Drops
NCT00493662
Comparison of Frequency of Use of Optive and Systane
NCT00406510
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporine Versus Tears for Improving Visual Outcomes Following Multifocal IOL Implantation
NCT00349583
Therapeutic Variables in Cataract Surgery
NCT00407017
Acular LS vs. Nevanac in Post op Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT00348582
Comfort Evaluation of a New MPS vs. Replenish in Contact Lens Patients
NCT00518700
A Multicenter Evaluation of Methods to Reduce Hyperemia Associated With Bimatoprost Therapy for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
NCT00348062
Brimonidine Purite 0.15% Versus Dorzolamide 2% Used as Adjunctive Therapy to Latanoprost
NCT00348400
Aqueous Concentrations and PGE2 Inhibition of Ketorolac 0.4% vs. Bromfenac 0.09% in Cataract Patients
NCT00347503
A Comparison of Optive in Patients Previously Using Systane for the Treatment of Dry Eye
NCT00399230
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 4 | 41 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Innovative Medical Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Innovative Medical is linked to 44 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 43 are already marked complete, representing roughly 98% of the total.
The phase mix for Innovative Medical reports 41 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Innovative Medical is Cataracts with 3 linked trials, and 6 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.