Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT06384664 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Cryoablation Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain After Thoracotomy and Thoracoscopy

A NA study of Pain, Postoperative and Intrathoracic Procedure, sponsored by University of Michigan.

Recruiting
Registry status
NA
Development phase
80
Enrollment target
1
Study location

NCT06384664 is a NA study of Pain, Postoperative and Intrathoracic Procedure that is actively recruiting participants, run by University of Michigan. The registered enrollment target is 80 participants, below the 272-participant average among 108 other Pain, Postoperative trials with a reported enrollment target (71% lower). The trial reports 1 study location across 1 state.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT06384664, a NA study of Pain, Postoperative and Intrathoracic Procedure, is actively recruiting participants, sponsored by University of Michigan.

RECRUITING
Registry status
NA
Development phase
80 participants
Enrollment target
1
Study location

Study Summary

The researchers will compare the common methods of post-surgical pain control, such as epidural or intercostal nerve block with a newer method called cryoablation. The research team is conducting this study to determine if cryoablation provides more effective pain control when compared to an epidural or intercostal nerve block.

Interventions

  • PROCEDURE Standard of Care
  • DEVICE Atricure's crysoSPHERE probe

Study Locations (1)

Michigan

  • University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 80 participants
Start Date 2024-06-03
Est. Completion 2028-04
Phase NA

Sponsor

University of Michigan

1,327 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT06384664

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT06384664 describes a study currently listed as recruiting, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 80 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect, below the 272-participant average among 108 other Pain, Postoperative trials with a reported enrollment target (71% lower). The listed sponsor is University of Michigan, which has 1,327 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 2 conditions, with Pain, Postoperative appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions - of which Standard of Care is the first listed.

NCT06384664 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area - top geographies include Michigan.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT06384664 about?

NCT06384664 is a clinical study titled "Cryoablation Effects on Acute and Chronic Pain After Thoracotomy and Thoracoscopy". The researchers will compare the common methods of post-surgical pain control, such as epidural or intercostal nerve block with a newer method called cryoablation. The research team is conducting this study to determine if cryoablation provides more effective pain control when compared to an epidura...

What is the current status of trial NCT06384664?

This trial is currently recruiting. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 80 participants. The study started on 2024-06-03. Estimated completion is 2028-04.

What conditions does trial NCT06384664 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Pain, Postoperative, Intrathoracic Procedure.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT06384664?

The interventions under investigation include: Standard of Care (PROCEDURE), Atricure's crysoSPHERE probe (DEVICE).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT06384664?

This trial is sponsored by University of Michigan, which has 1,327 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Where is trial NCT06384664 being conducted?

This trial has 1 study location across Michigan. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Similar trials for Pain, Postoperative

Matched on the same primary condition, ranked to surface studies in the same phase first, then by recruiting status, no relevance scoring or editorial curation.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.