Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation sponsors 15 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 14 completed. 9 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 0 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Atrial Fibrillation, with 3 trials.
Trial Pipeline
15 total, page 1 of 1
Safety and Efficacy of Pulsed-field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in High Versus Low-volume Ablation Centers (SAFFICIENT)
NCT06488820
Half-normal Saline in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
NCT03498586
Role of Cardiac Biomarkers in Prediction of Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation
NCT02208102
Outcome of Different Ablation Strategies In Persistent and Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT02533843
Determining the Association of Chromosomal Variants With Non-PV Triggers and Ablation-outcome in AF (DECAF)
NCT01751607
Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation After Permanent Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation With or Without Proven Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation
NCT01660100
Impact Of Different Ablation Approaches on Outcome In Coexistent Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter
NCT01439386
Effect of Catheter Ablation on Clinical Course of Migraine in AF Patients With or Without Previous History of Migraine
NCT01391091
Effect of Empirical Left Atrial Appendage Isolation on Long-term Procedure Outcome in Patients With Persistent or Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Catheter Ablation
NCT01362738
Effect of Amiodarone on the Procedure Outcome in Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Antral Isolation
NCT01173809
The Role of Cardiac Biomarkers in Prediction of Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation
NCT01148914
Ablation of Perimitral Flutter Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Outcomes
NCT01173796
Ablation of Clinical Ventricular Tachycardia Versus Addition of Substrate Ablation on the Long Term Success Rate of VT Ablation
NCT01045668
Role of Coumadin in Preventing Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation
NCT01006876
Ablation vs Amiodarone for Treatment of AFib in Patients With CHF and an ICD
NCT00729911
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 3 | 8 |
| Phase 4 | 1 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation is linked to 15 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 14 are already marked complete, representing roughly 93% of the total.
The phase mix for Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation reports 9 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation is Atrial Fibrillation with 3 linked trials, and 3 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.