Smith & Nephew

72 total trials 3 currently recruiting 39 completed

Smith & Nephew sponsors 72 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 3 of them currently recruiting, and 39 completed. 4 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 0 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Total Knee Arthroplasty, with 3 trials.

Trial Pipeline

72 total, page 2 of 2

TERMINATED

TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System

NCT02204228

COMPLETED NA

Post-Market Evaluation of the Rotation Medical Rotator Cuff System

NCT02200939

TERMINATED NA

A RCT to Compare the Effects of Two Wound Products on Biofilm Disruption in DFUs

NCT02181621

TERMINATED NA

Mechanical vs. Radiofrequency-Based Debridement in the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Lesions

NCT01803880

TERMINATED NA

Visionaire™ Versus Standard Instrumentation Safety and Efficacy in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)

NCT01084772

COMPLETED NA

PICO Breast Reduction Clinical Study Looking at Incision Healing Complications

NCT01640366

COMPLETED

Safety and Efficacy of the Journey II BCS Total Knee System

NCT01705067

TERMINATED NA

TRIGEN SURESHOT™ Distal Targeting System Study

NCT01327508

COMPLETED

VISIONAIRE™ Value Study

NCT01107769

COMPLETED

R3® Acetabular System in Patients With Degenerative Hip Disease

NCT01407029

TERMINATED NA

LEGION™ Primary Safety and Efficacy

NCT04040985

TERMINATED NA

Ascension PyroCarbon Radial Head Study

NCT02405234

COMPLETED NA

Evaluation of the Use of EZCare/V1STA in the Management of Acute and Chronic Wounds

NCT00994162

TERMINATED Phase 4

Knee Articular Cartilage Debridement in Conjunction With Partial Meniscectomy

NCT00613535

TERMINATED

INTUIT Hip Fracture Outcome Study

NCT00595634

COMPLETED NA

Trial of Versajet Compared With Conventional Treatment in Acute and Chronic Wounds

NCT01050673

COMPLETED

Ankle Joint Replacement Outcomes Study

NCT00503438

COMPLETED NA

A Safety and Efficacy Study of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System

NCT00611585

COMPLETED

A Study of Patients Treated With the Journey Deuce Bicompartmental Knee System

NCT01704326

COMPLETED Phase 4

Study Comparing VERSAJET With Conventional Surgical Procedures in the Removal of Unhealthy Tissue From Lower Limb Ulcers

NCT00521027

COMPLETED NA

Safety and Effectiveness Study of the Reflection Ceramic Acetabular System

NCT00663351

TERMINATED NA

Ascension® Post- Approval Study; PyroCarbon Metacarpophalangeal Total Joint Prosthesis

NCT02408471

← Previous Page 2 of 2

What the Pipeline for Smith & Nephew Shows

According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Smith & Nephew is linked to 72 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 3 studies are currently recruiting, about 4% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 39 are already marked complete, representing roughly 54% of the total.

The phase mix for Smith & Nephew reports 4 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).

The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Smith & Nephew is Total Knee Arthroplasty with 3 linked trials, and 9 other condition areas appear in the top list above.

How to read these pipeline numbers

Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.

A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.

That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.