Procter and Gamble
Trial Pipeline
Assessing Gingivitis and Plaque From a Marketed Toothpaste
NCT07158112
Evaluating Gingivitis and Systemic Biomarkers
NCT06962956
A Meta-analysis Comparing Toothbrushes on Plaque Removal and Gingival Health
NCT05594004
Brief Title: a Clinical Study to Assess Gingivitis
NCT06659471
Overnight Pant Study for Children With Nocturnal Enuresis
NCT05178641
Salivary Fluoride Clearance
NCT06735235
Improvement of Dry Mouth Sufferers After Using an Experimental Dry Mouth Rinse Compared to a Water Control
NCT04189081
A Clinical Study to Assess the Effects of Various Dentifrice Technologies on Dentinal Hypersensitivity
NCT03965039
A Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Denture Adhesive to Seal Out Food Particles From Under the Mandibular Partial Denture
NCT05908890
In-use Study of Four Different Tampons
NCT03478371
Meta-analysis of Stannous Fluoride Dentifrice and the Effects on Dentine Hypersensitivity
NCT04005417
Meta-analysis of Stannous Fluoride and the Effects on Dental Plaque
NCT04006483
Meta-analysis of Stannous Fluoride and the Effects on Enamel Erosion
NCT04006470
Analysis of Stannous Fluoride in GCF and Subgingival Plaque
NCT03296657
A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Method for Plaque When Comparing Stannous Fluoride Toothpaste to a Regular Dentifrice
NCT02543060
A Pilot Study to Assess Nominal Versus Controlled Stimuli on Dentinal Hypersensitivity
NCT02406573
Effectiveness of Two Water-Based Potassium Oxalate Desensitizers
NCT02192307
A Clinical Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of a Disposable Intra-vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
NCT02131311
Study of Psyllium 6.8 g Versus Placebo on Satiety in Healthy Volunteers
NCT01809925
Comparison of Psyllium and Microcrystalline Cellulose on Glycemic Measures in Subjects With Impaired Fasting Glucose
NCT01549600
A Study is to Evaluate a Regimen on Gingivitis Using Traditional and Novel Assessment Methods
NCT07211061
Study to Evaluate a Probiotic in Healthy Subjects With a History of Abdominal Discomfort and Bloating
NCT01099696
Evaluate Retention of an Orally Administered Device Using Gamma Scintigraphy
NCT00754091
A Study of the Effects of Probiotics in Children Grades 1-3
NCT00635388
Study to Evaluate Potential Food Effects
NCT00791817
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 4 |
| Phase 4 | 2 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Procter and Gamble Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Procter and Gamble is linked to 25 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting — about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio — and 23 are already marked complete, representing roughly 92% of the total. Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
The phase mix for Procter and Gamble reports 2 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 4 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2). A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work — safety, dosing, and early signal detection — and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Procter and Gamble is Gingivitis with 5 linked trials, and 9 other condition areas appear in the top list above. That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice — verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.