Innocoll
Innocoll sponsors 19 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 17 completed. 8 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 11 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Hernioplasty, with 1 trials.
Trial Pipeline
19 total, page 1 of 1
Efficacy and Safety Study of Postsurgical Analgesia With INL-001 in Abdominoplasty
NCT04785625
An Open-label Safety and Pharmacokinetic Study of INL-001 in Adults Following Various Open Soft-Tissue Surgeries
NCT04785638
Pharmacokinetics, Relative Bioavailability and Safety of INL-001 Compared to Marcaine After Open Hernioplasty
NCT03234374
Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty
NCT02525133
Phase 3 Study of Efficacy and Safety of the XaraColl® Bupivacaine Implant After Hernioplasty
NCT02523599
Study of a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge Along With Systemic Antibiotic in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT02447172
Study of a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge Along With Systemic Antibiotic in Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT02427802
Pharmacokinetics, Relative Bioavailability and Safety of Xaracoll Implant
NCT02232178
Assess the Feasibility and Efficacy of the CollaRx® Bupivacaine Implant Laparoscopic Inguinal or Umbilical Herniorrhaphy
NCT01224145
Safety and Efficacy of CollaRx® Bupivacaine Implant in Men After Open Laparotomy Herniorrhaphy
NCT01220024
Efficacy and Safety of the CollaRx Bupivacaine Implant Compared to the ON-Q Painbuster Following Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT00749749
Efficacy and Safety of A Collagen Bupivacaine Implant in Patients After Gastrointestinal Surgery
NCT00661466
The Safety and Efficacy of an Antibiotic Sponge in Diabetic Patients With Moderately Infected Foot Ulcers
NCT00659646
Prevention of Infection Using a Topical Gentamicin-Collagen Sponge in Diabetic Patients With An Uninfected Foot Ulcer
NCT00658957
Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetic Profile of a Collagen Bupivacaine Implant in Men After Open Mesh Herniorrhaphy
NCT00626886
A Study of an Antibiotic Implant in General Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Surgical Wound Infection
NCT00600925
Efficacy and Safety of a Collagen Bupivacaine Implant in Women Following Abdominal Hysterectomy
NCT00624910
Safety and Efficacy of an Antibiotic Implant in Cardiac Surgical Subjects at Higher Risk for Sternal Wound Infection
NCT00600483
Safety and Efficacy of an Antibiotic Sponge in Diabetic Patients With a Mild Infection of a Foot Ulcer
NCT00593567
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 1 |
| Phase 2 | 10 |
| Phase 3 | 8 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Innocoll Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Innocoll is linked to 19 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 17 are already marked complete, representing roughly 89% of the total.
The phase mix for Innocoll reports 8 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 11 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Innocoll is Hernioplasty with 1 linked trial, and 6 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.