Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated sponsors 174 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 3 of them currently recruiting, and 158 completed. 60 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 42 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Myopia, with 9 trials.
Trial Pipeline
174 total, page 3 of 4
A Study to Evaluate the Performance of Two Designs of Soft Toric Lenses
NCT01309867
Safety and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01277341
Evaluation of the Feasibility a New Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens
NCT01309906
Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension for the Treatment of Ocular Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT01230125
Product Feasibility of a New Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens
NCT01309100
Study of A New Contact Lens Cleaning and Disinfecting Solution
NCT01318577
One-Piece Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lens in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Extraction
NCT01230060
Study to Evaluate a Contact Lens Lubricating and Rewetting Drop
NCT01267656
Accommodation Measurements After Bilateral Implantation of an Aspheric Accommodating Lens and Monofocal Aspheric Lenses
NCT01241279
A Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution in Dry Eye Disease
NCT01212471
A Study to Evaluate the Product Performance of a Daily Disposable Contact Lens
NCT01192126
Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303242-X Ophthalmic Suspension in Dry Eye Syndrome
NCT01163643
Toric Intraocular Lens Following Cataract Surgery
NCT01140477
Evaluation of 3 Intraocular Lenses Following Lens Extraction
NCT01122576
Safety of Besivance™ (Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension) 0.6% Compared to Vehicle
NCT01175590
Safety and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution in Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis Patients
NCT01174823
Evaluation of Two Different Designs of Bausch & Lomb Contact Lenses
NCT01118338
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Nasal Product After Ragweed Pollen Exposure in an Environmental Chamber
NCT01222299
Feasibility of a New Silicone Hydrogel Lens
NCT01131130
Extension Study to Gather Data on Effect of Macugen on the Corneal Endothelium
NCT01573572
Loteprednol Ophthalmic Base Compared to Loteprednol Ophthalmic Suspension vs Placebo in an Allergen Challenge
NCT01107405
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Daily Disposable Contact Lens
NCT01130974
Evaluation of Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
NCT01060072
Ketotifen/Naphazoline Ophthalmic Solution in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model of Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis.
NCT00770133
Loteprednol Etabonate Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation and Pain Following Cataract Surgery
NCT01010633
A Study to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of a Novel Multipurpose Solution
NCT01024751
Efficacy of Besifloxacin Ophthalmic Suspension in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis
NCT00972777
Performance Evaluation of Contact Lenses Among a Population of Adapted Contact Lens Wearers
NCT00985231
Evaluation of BOL-303242-X Versus Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT00905450
Concentration of Besifloxacin, Gatifloxacin, and Moxifloxacin in Human Conjunctiva After Topical Instillation
NCT00905762
Study of T-PRED(TM) Compared to Pred Forte(R) II
NCT00854061
Assessment of the Concentrations of Besifloxacin, Moxifloxacin, or Gatifloxacin in the Aqueous Humor of Subjects
NCT00824070
Efficacy Study of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery
NCT00853970
A Product Performance Evaluation of a Novel Contact Lens for Daily Disposable Use
NCT00784641
One-Day Dispensing Clinical Evaluation of SofLens Daily Disposable Lenses Compared to a Marketed 1 Day Contact Lens
NCT00902850
Ketotifen/Naphazoline Ophthalmic Solution in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model of Allergic Conjunctivitis.
NCT00769886
Safety and Efficacy of an Ophthalmic Solution in Dry Eye Disease
NCT00758784
Evaluation of a Multi-Purpose Solution
NCT00710879
Loteprednol Etabonate in an Ophthalmic Base vs Vehicle for the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT00699153
Efficacy and Safety of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution in Cataract Surgery
NCT00704418
Efficacy and Safety of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution in Cataract Surgery
NCT00703781
Safety and Efficacy of Zylet vs Lotemax, Tobramycin and Vehicle in Pediatric Blepharoconjunctivitis
NCT00705159
Study of T-PRED(TM) Compared to Pred Forte(R)
NCT00699803
Efficacy Study of Ecabet Ophthalmic Solution in Dry Eye Disease
NCT00667004
Safety and Efficacy of a Bausch & Lomb Multipurpose Solution When Compared to Ciba Vision Aquify Multipurpose Solution
NCT00636363
Loteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Ointment vs. Vehicle in the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery
NCT00645671
Performance of Bausch & Lomb ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose Solution in a New Packaging Configuration
NCT00659815
Comparative Performance of PureVision, Acuvue Oasys and O2Optix
NCT00640341
Efficacy and Safety of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution
NCT00585975
Efficacy and Safety Study of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution in Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT00586664
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 16 |
| Phase 2 | 26 |
| Phase 3 | 46 |
| Phase 4 | 14 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Bausch & Lomb Incorporated Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated is linked to 174 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 3 studies are currently recruiting, about 2% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 158 are already marked complete, representing roughly 91% of the total.
The phase mix for Bausch & Lomb Incorporated reports 60 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 42 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Bausch & Lomb Incorporated is Myopia with 9 linked trials, and 9 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.