Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT01972685 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Comparison of Transbronchial, Cryoprobe and VATS Biopsy For the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)

A NA study of Interstitial Lung Disease, sponsored by Duke University.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
14
Enrollment target
1
Study location

NCT01972685 is a NA study of Interstitial Lung Disease that has completed, run by Duke University. The registered enrollment target is 14 participants, below the 566-participant average among 36 other Interstitial Lung Disease trials with a reported enrollment target (98% lower). The trial reports 1 study location across 1 state.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT01972685, a NA study of Interstitial Lung Disease, has completed, sponsored by Duke University.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
14 participants
Enrollment target
1
Study location

Study Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the sample size, architectural preservation and diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic cryo-probe transbronchial lung biopsy (C-TBBx) to bronchoscopic standard transbronchial lung biopsy (S-TBBx) and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lung biopsy for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD).

Conditions Studied

Interventions

  • PROCEDURE Cryobiopsy biopsy
  • PROCEDURE Transbronchial Biopsy
  • PROCEDURE VATS biopsy

Study Locations (1)

North Carolina

  • Duke University Medical Center - Durham

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 14 participants
Start Date 2013-06
Est. Completion 2018-03-30
Phase NA

Sponsor

Duke University

1,725 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT01972685

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT01972685 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 14 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect, below the 566-participant average among 36 other Interstitial Lung Disease trials with a reported enrollment target (98% lower). The listed sponsor is Duke University, which has 1,725 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 1 condition, with Interstitial Lung Disease appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 3 interventions - of which Cryobiopsy biopsy is the first listed.

NCT01972685 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area - top geographies include North Carolina.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT01972685 about?

NCT01972685 is a clinical study titled "Comparison of Transbronchial, Cryoprobe and VATS Biopsy For the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)". The objective of this study is to compare the sample size, architectural preservation and diagnostic yield of bronchoscopic cryo-probe transbronchial lung biopsy (C-TBBx) to bronchoscopic standard transbronchial lung biopsy (S-TBBx) and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) lung biopsy for the...

What is the current status of trial NCT01972685?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 14 participants. The study started on 2013-06. Estimated completion is 2018-03-30.

What conditions does trial NCT01972685 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Interstitial Lung Disease.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT01972685?

The interventions under investigation include: Cryobiopsy biopsy (PROCEDURE), Transbronchial Biopsy (PROCEDURE), VATS biopsy (PROCEDURE).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT01972685?

This trial is sponsored by Duke University, which has 1,725 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Where is trial NCT01972685 being conducted?

This trial has 1 study location across North Carolina. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Similar trials for Interstitial Lung Disease

Matched on the same primary condition, ranked to surface studies in the same phase first, then by recruiting status, no relevance scoring or editorial curation.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.