Revision Skincare
Revision Skincare sponsors 18 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 18 completed. The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Fine Lines, with 4 trials.
Trial Pipeline
18 total, page 1 of 1
A 4-week Study Investigating Two Targeted Brightening Serum (A and B) Versus 4% Hydroquinone in Women With Mild to Severe Full-face Hyperpigmentation
NCT07644871
A 16-week Clinical Study Investigating a Dark Spot Corrector Serum in Women With Moderate Discrete Hyperpigmentation
NCT07468175
Evaluation of the Safety and Tolerability of a Brightening Treatment Paired With a Skincare Regimen
NCT07501000
Efficacy and Tolerability of a Scalp Serum
NCT07500623
Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With Fractional Ablative CO2 Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
NCT06366503
Clinical Case Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment on Healthy Females with Fitzpatrick Skin Types V and VI
NCT06633731
A Twelve Week Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Sunscreen Moisturizer SPF 50+
NCT06148558
Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With a Radiofrequency Microneedling for Facial Rejuvenation
NCT06157853
A Clinical Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Topical Facial Treatment For Facial Rejuvenation
NCT06629792
A 12 Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Eye Cream
NCT05807620
Evaluating Procedure Pairing of a Post-Procedure Cream Versus a Comparator in Patients Treated With a Hybrid-Fractional Laser for Facial Rejuvenation
NCT06436261
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Efficacy and Tolerability of a Daily Anti-Aging Daily Serum
NCT05514782
A Multi-Center, Open-label Study Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Dual Skincare Regimen Treatment for Facial Hyperpigmentation and Photodamaged Skin in Patients Exposed to Extrinsic Factors of Aging
NCT05423873
A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Anti-Aging Serum
NCT05271136
An Open-Label Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Face Cream and Eye Cream
NCT04911374
Investigation of the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Cosmetic Product With Onabotulinumtoxin A in the Treatment of Facial Lines
NCT05089851
A Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Cosmetic Product in the Treatment of Facial Lines
NCT04545970
A Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Tolerability of a Cosmetic Product for Arm Firming
NCT04065035
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Revision Skincare Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Revision Skincare is linked to 18 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 18 are already marked complete, representing roughly 100% of the total.
The phase mix for Revision Skincare reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Revision Skincare is Fine Lines with 4 linked trials, and 5 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.