Restor3D

20 total trials 8 completed

Restor3D sponsors 20 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 8 completed. The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Osteoarthritis, with 3 trials.

Trial Pipeline

20 total, page 1 of 1

COMPLETED

Retrospective Evaluation of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Following Total Talus Replacement

NCT05231304

TERMINATED

Cervical Interbody Fusion Device Patient Registry

NCT05114356

TERMINATED

A Study to Evaluate the Conformis iTotal Identity Knee Replacement System

NCT04667559

TERMINATED

TKA Operating Room Efficiency for TKA Using Customized Implant Techniques

NCT04180423

TERMINATED

A Study to Evaluate the Conformis Hip System

NCT03738462

TERMINATED

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iTotal® (PS) Knee Replacement System

NCT03152162

COMPLETED

A Retrospective Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iTotal® Posterior Stabilized (PS) Knee Replacement System

NCT03289000

COMPLETED

A Retrospective Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iUni, iDuo & iTotal® KRS

NCT03152357

TERMINATED

A Single Time-Point Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iTotal (PS) Knee Replacement System Versus Off-the-Shelf

NCT03146819

TERMINATED NA

A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Functional Outcome After Knee Replacement

NCT02494544

COMPLETED

A Single Time-Point Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iTotal® (CR) Knee Versus Off-the-Shelf

NCT02251522

TERMINATED

Total Knee Arthroplasty Functional Outcomes Study Research Design

NCT02228538

COMPLETED

Costs and Benefits of ConforMIS iTotal® Knee Replacement System Versus Standard Total Knee

NCT01899417

COMPLETED

In Vivo Comparison of Knee Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With Either a ConforMIS or Traditional Knee Implant

NCT01882751

TERMINATED

A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iTotal® (CR) Knee Replacement System

NCT01820650

TERMINATED

Study Comparing Fit of the iTotal Versus Standard Total Knee Implants

NCT01861028

COMPLETED

Comparison of Knee Kinematics for Subjects Implanted With Either a ConforMIS or Traditional Knee Implant

NCT01717001

TERMINATED

Study of the ConforMIS iDuo(R) G2

NCT01564641

COMPLETED

A Retrospective Study of the iTotal CR Knee Replacement System

NCT01564654

TERMINATED

Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the ConforMIS iUni Knee Implant

NCT01117571

What the Pipeline for Restor3D Shows

According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Restor3D is linked to 20 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 8 are already marked complete, representing roughly 40% of the total.

The phase mix for Restor3D reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).

The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Restor3D is Osteoarthritis with 3 linked trials, and 2 other condition areas appear in the top list above.

How to read these pipeline numbers

Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.

A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.

That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.