New York Institute of Technology
Trial Pipeline
Comparing Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulation vs. Wrist Immobilization for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
NCT07432750
Examining Executive Functions in Medical Students Across Different Types of Study Breaks
NCT06710678
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment RCT and Computational Modeling for Head Injuries in Mixed Martial Artists
NCT06851234
Effect of a Week-long Social Media Abstention on Sustained Attention Functions
NCT06114017
Effects Of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine(OMM) On Lower Extremity Muscle Characteristics In Parkinson's Disease(PD) Patients
NCT05884944
Comparing Two Eccentric Protocols on Muscle Damage
NCT06992271
Light Exposure on Pain in Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
NCT05561270
Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) and Phototherapy for Patients With Chronic Lower Back Pain
NCT01765777
The Efficacy of a Remote Cognitive Remediation Therapy (CRT) Program on Parkinson's Disease
NCT04955275
Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment of Fascial Restrictions on Body Awareness, Mood, and Proprioception
NCT04945798
Treatment Protocol for PD Fatigue Management With CBT
NCT03747848
Osteopathic Manual Treatment Parkinson's Disease and Truncal Dystonia
NCT03307161
Fit Physicians: Use of Activity Monitors and Activity Integration Program in First Year Medical Students
NCT02778009
The Effect of Aerobic Exercise and Gaming on Cognitive Performance
NCT02437097
Whole Body Periodic Acceleration on Activity and Sleep In Parkinson's Disease
NCT02874261
The Effects of L-Tyrosine on 24 Hour Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Parkinson's Disease
NCT02259049
Study of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine on the Autonomic Nervous System
NCT02193373
Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine on Parkinson Disease
NCT02107638
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 1 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for New York Institute of Technology Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, New York Institute of Technology is linked to 76 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 66 studies are currently recruiting — about 87% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio — and 10 are already marked complete, representing roughly 13% of the total. Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
The phase mix for New York Institute of Technology reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 1 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2). A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work — safety, dosing, and early signal detection — and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for New York Institute of Technology is Parkinson Disease with 5 linked trials, and 9 other condition areas appear in the top list above. That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice — verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.