Kodiak Sciences
Kodiak Sciences sponsors 11 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 2 of them currently recruiting, and 2 completed. 9 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 2 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation, with 2 trials.
Trial Pipeline
11 total, page 1 of 1
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-101 in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation (MESI) - PEAK
NCT06990399
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-101 in Participants With Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation (MESI) - PINNACLE
NCT06996080
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer and Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) - DAYBREAK
NCT06556368
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tarcocimab Tedromer Compared With Sham Treatment in Participants With Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
NCT06270836
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-301 in Non-proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)
NCT05066230
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal KSI-301 Compared With Intravitreal Aflibercept in Participants With Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration (wAMD)
NCT04964089
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
NCT04603937
A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
NCT04611152
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Durability, and Safety of KSI-301 Compared to Aflibercept in Patients With Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)
NCT04592419
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KSI-301, an Anti-VEGF Antibody Biopolymer Conjugate, Versus Aflibercept in Patients With Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
NCT04049266
Exploratory Study to Investigate the Bioactivity, Ocular and Systemic Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics Following Single and Multiple Intravitreal Administrations of KSI-301 in Subjects With wAMD, DME and RVO
NCT03790852
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 1 |
| Phase 2 | 1 |
| Phase 3 | 9 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Kodiak Sciences Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Kodiak Sciences is linked to 11 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 2 studies are currently recruiting, about 18% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 2 are already marked complete, representing roughly 18% of the total.
The phase mix for Kodiak Sciences reports 9 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 2 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Kodiak Sciences is Macular Edema Secondary to Inflammation with 2 linked trials, and 2 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.