Healthpoint
Healthpoint sponsors 25 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 22 completed. 11 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 11 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Follow up to Acute Wound Scar Study, with 1 trials.
Trial Pipeline
25 total, page 1 of 1
A Phase 2 Exploratory Pharmacodynamic Study of HP802-247 in Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT02154087
Santyl Applications to Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT02111291
Study of Oasis Ultra in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01835379
Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers >12 cm2 to ≤ 36 cm2
NCT01737762
Long Term Follow Up to Determine the Effects of Collagenase SANTYL Ointment on Scar Formation
NCT01705860
Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT01656889
Comparison of HP011-101 to Standard Care for Stage I-II Pressure Ulcers in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT01433159
Using Santyl on Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01408277
Healing Effects of HP802-247 Versus Antibiotic Ointment in Mohs Micrographic Surgery Patients
NCT01359735
Study to Determine if Fibrin Affects the Ability of a Wound to Heal
NCT01253135
Wound Edge Changes Following Treatment With Santyl
NCT01197898
Study of Survival Duration for Donor Skin Cells in Skin Biopsy Wounds
NCT01190865
Enzymatic Versus (vs) Autolytic Debridement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01143727
A Study to Look at the Effects of Four Weeks of Treatment on the Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01143714
Evaluation of Effects of HP828-101 for Moisture Associated Skin Damage
NCT01108523
Santyl vs. Sharp Debridement of Diabetic Foot Wounds
NCT01056198
Evaluation of the Effects of HP828-101 Versus Standard of Care in the Management of Partial or Full Thickness Wounds
NCT00971048
Safety Follow-Up to HP 802-247-09-015
NCT00900029
Dose Finding Study of HP802-247 in Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT00852995
Cumulative Irritation Potential of 828 Ointment
NCT00767455
Contact Sensitization Potential of 828 Ointment
NCT00767676
Controlled Study of the Effect of Xenaderm® Ointment Vehicle Versus White Petrolatum on Healing
NCT00713349
Effect of Collagenase on Healing and Scarring
NCT00651820
Clinical Evaluation of the Photoallergy Potential of Xenaderm Ointment
NCT00645164
OASIS Wound Matrix (Oasis) Mechanism of Action
NCT00570141
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 6 |
| Phase 2 | 5 |
| Phase 3 | 2 |
| Phase 4 | 9 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Healthpoint Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Healthpoint is linked to 25 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 22 are already marked complete, representing roughly 88% of the total.
The phase mix for Healthpoint reports 11 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 11 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Healthpoint is Follow up to Acute Wound Scar Study with 1 linked trial, and 3 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.