Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT00163124 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Best Approach to Care Compared to Diversified Chiropractic Adjustive Technique

A NA study of Low Back Pain and Headache, sponsored by Parker College of Chiropractic.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
155
Enrollment target
1
Study location

NCT00163124 is a NA study of Low Back Pain and Headache that has completed, run by Parker College of Chiropractic. The registered enrollment target is 155 participants, below the 503-participant average among 122 other Low Back Pain trials with a reported enrollment target (69% lower). The trial reports 1 study location across 1 state.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT00163124, a NA study of Low Back Pain and Headache, has completed, sponsored by Parker College of Chiropractic.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
155 participants
Enrollment target
1
Study location

Study Summary

There are a variety of treatment approaches used by the chiropractic profession. Some of these require forceful joint manipulation and some do not. This study is designed to compare outcomes of two such techniques that are common to chiropractic practice. The hypothesis is that there is no difference between forceful and non-forceful approaches to treatment.

Interventions

  • PROCEDURE spinal manipulation & patient education/nutrition

Study Locations (1)

Texas

  • Parker College of Chiropractic - Dallas

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 155 participants
Start Date 2005-03
Est. Completion 2005-08
Phase NA

Sponsor

Parker College of Chiropractic

1 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT00163124

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT00163124 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 155 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect, below the 503-participant average among 122 other Low Back Pain trials with a reported enrollment target (69% lower). The listed sponsor is Parker College of Chiropractic, which has 1 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 3 conditions, with Low Back Pain appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 1 intervention - of which spinal manipulation & patient education/nutrition is the first listed.

NCT00163124 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area - top geographies include Texas.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT00163124 about?

NCT00163124 is a clinical study titled "A Randomized Controlled Trial of Best Approach to Care Compared to Diversified Chiropractic Adjustive Technique". There are a variety of treatment approaches used by the chiropractic profession. Some of these require forceful joint manipulation and some do not. This study is designed to compare outcomes of two such techniques that are common to chiropractic practice. The hypothesis is that there is no differenc...

What is the current status of trial NCT00163124?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 155 participants. The study started on 2005-03. Estimated completion is 2005-08.

What conditions does trial NCT00163124 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Low Back Pain, Headache, Shoulder Pain.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT00163124?

The interventions under investigation include: spinal manipulation & patient education/nutrition (PROCEDURE).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT00163124?

This trial is sponsored by Parker College of Chiropractic, which has 1 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Where is trial NCT00163124 being conducted?

This trial has 1 study location across Texas. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Similar trials for Low Back Pain

Matched on the same primary condition, ranked to surface studies in the same phase first, then by recruiting status, no relevance scoring or editorial curation.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.