Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Dynavax Technologies Corporation sponsors 16 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 1 of them currently recruiting, and 11 completed. 3 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 12 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Prevention of Pneumonic Plague Resulting From Aerosol Exposure to Yersenia Pestis, with 1 trials.
Trial Pipeline
16 total, page 1 of 1
Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of rF1V-1018 Vaccine in Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age
NCT07207408
Trial of the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of rF1V Vaccine With CpG 1018® Adjuvant Compared With rF1V Vaccine in Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age
NCT05506969
HEPLISAV-B® in Adults With End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Undergoing Hemodialysis
NCT03934736
Phase 1b DV281 With an Anti-PD-1 Inhibitor in NSCLC
NCT03326752
A Trial of Intratumoral Injections of SD-101 in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma or Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT02521870
Study of SD-101 in Combination With Localized Low-dose Radiation in Patients With Untreated Low-grade B-cell Lymphoma
NCT02266147
Safety and Immunogenicity Study of the Hepatitis B Vaccine, HEPLISAV™, Compared to Engerix-B® Vaccine
NCT02117934
A Study of the Immune Response to Heplisav in Healthy Older Adults
NCT01999699
Long-Term Study on Safety and Immunogenicity of HEPLISAV™ and Engerix-B® in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT01282762
Safety and Immunogenicity Study of the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Vaccine, HEPLISAV Compared to Engerix-B Vaccine
NCT01005407
Comparing Safety and Immunogenicity of HEPLISAV-B® to Engerix-B® in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Patients
NCT00985426
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of SD-101 in Healthy Normal Males
NCT00599001
Open-Label Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of HEPLISAV™ Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine
NCT00511095
A Study of 1018 Immunostimulatory Sequence (ISS) Administered With Irinotecan and Cetuximab to Treat Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT00403052
Efficacy and Safety Study of TOLAMBA™ in Ragweed-Allergic Adults
NCT00387738
Safety of HEPLISAV™ Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine in End-stage Kidney Failure Patients
NCT00426712
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 8 |
| Phase 2 | 4 |
| Phase 3 | 3 |
What the Pipeline for Dynavax Technologies Corporation Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Dynavax Technologies Corporation is linked to 16 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 1 studies are currently recruiting, about 6% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 11 are already marked complete, representing roughly 69% of the total.
The phase mix for Dynavax Technologies Corporation reports 3 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 12 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Dynavax Technologies Corporation is Prevention of Pneumonic Plague Resulting From Aerosol Exposure to Yersenia Pestis with 1 linked trial, and 2 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.