Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.
NCT06293794 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA
Decision Support for Heart Failure Prescribing
A NA study of Heart Failure and Decision Support Systems, Clinical, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver.
- Active
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 764
- Enrollment target
- 1
- Study location
NCT06293794 is a NA study of Heart Failure and Decision Support Systems, Clinical that is active but no longer recruiting, run by University of Colorado, Denver. The registered enrollment target is 764 participants, below the 2,047-participant average among 397 other Heart Failure trials with a reported enrollment target (63% lower). The trial reports 1 study location across 1 state.
The verdict
NCT06293794, a NA study of Heart Failure and Decision Support Systems, Clinical, is active but no longer recruiting, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver.
- ACTIVE NOT RECRUITING
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 764 participants
- Enrollment target
- 1
- Study location
Study Summary
Clinical decision support (CDS) tools can 'nudge' clinicians to make the best decisions easy. Although required by "meaningful use" regulations, more than 40% of CDS lead to no change and the remaining lead to improvements that are modest at best. This is because CDS tools often ignore contextual factors and present irrelevant information. Although many tools have undergone patient-specific optimization, 'traditional CDS' are rarely clinician-specific. For example, a traditional CDS tool for beta blockers and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) addresses common prescribing misconceptions by stating asthma is not a contraindication and providing a safe threshold for blood pressure. For clinicians without these misconceptions, these statements are irrelevant and distract from key information. A 'personalized CDS' would evaluate clinician past prescribing patterns to determine whether prescribing misconceptions might exist and then conditionally present information to address those misconceptions. The objective of this research is to create personalized clinician-specific CDS that overcome shortcomings of traditional CDS. The central hypothesis is a personalized CDS that minimizes irrelevant information will lead to a higher rate of prescribing guideline-directed management and therapy (GDMT) for HFrEF compared to a traditional CDS.
Conditions Studied
Interventions
- OTHER Personalized Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
- OTHER Traditional Clinical Decision Support (CDS)
Study Locations (1)
Colorado
- UCHealth Primary Care and Cardiology Outpatient Clinics - Aurora
Trial Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Enrollment Target | 764 participants |
| Start Date | 2025-02-11 |
| Est. Completion | 2025-09 |
| Phase | NA |
Interested in This Trial?
Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT06293794
The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT06293794 describes a study currently listed as active not recruiting, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 764 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect, below the 2,047-participant average among 397 other Heart Failure trials with a reported enrollment target (63% lower). The listed sponsor is University of Colorado, Denver, which has 1,283 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.
The record links to 2 conditions, with Heart Failure appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions - of which Personalized Clinical Decision Support (CDS) is the first listed.
NCT06293794 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area - top geographies include Colorado.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is clinical trial NCT06293794 about?
NCT06293794 is a clinical study titled "Decision Support for Heart Failure Prescribing". Clinical decision support (CDS) tools can 'nudge' clinicians to make the best decisions easy. Although required by "meaningful use" regulations, more than 40% of CDS lead to no change and the remaining lead to improvements that are modest at best. This is because CDS tools often ignore contextual fa...
What is the current status of trial NCT06293794?
This trial is currently active not recruiting. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 764 participants. The study started on 2025-02-11. Estimated completion is 2025-09.
What conditions does trial NCT06293794 study?
This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Heart Failure, Decision Support Systems, Clinical.
What interventions are being tested in trial NCT06293794?
The interventions under investigation include: Personalized Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (OTHER), Traditional Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (OTHER).
Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT06293794?
This trial is sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver, which has 1,283 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Where is trial NCT06293794 being conducted?
This trial has 1 study location across Colorado. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.
Learn More About Clinical Trials
Similar trials for Heart Failure
Matched on the same primary condition, ranked to surface studies in the same phase first, then by recruiting status, no relevance scoring or editorial curation.
-
Early Feasibility Study of the NORM™ System in Heart Failure Patients (FUTURE-HFII)
RECRUITING · NA
-
Diuretics Alone vs. Aortix Endovascular Device for Acute Heart Failure
RECRUITING · NA
-
iCardia4HF: Multi-component mHealth Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure
RECRUITING · NA
-
Optimizing Heart Failure Therapies Among Patients With Limited Access in Denver
RECRUITING · NA
-
Hemodynamic Monitoring to Prevent Adverse Events foLlowing cardiOgenic Shock Trial
RECRUITING · NA
-
Effect of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Address Social Determinants of Health on Rehospitalization Rates in Patients With Heart Failure
RECRUITING · NA
Explore more on PlainTrial
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.