Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

COMPLETED NA

Precision-Based Approach to Matching Evidence-Based Interventions to Students With Externalizing Behaviors

NCT05752942 · View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Study Summary

Although prevalent across schools in the US, the "One-Size-Fits-All" (OSFA) approach to selecting evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for student externalizing behaviors often yields lackluster outcomes, due to the mismatch between the EBI and students' heterogeneous needs. Emerging literature highlighted the promise of the precision approach to intervention (e.g., Student Intervention Matching System; SIMS), whereas EBIs were selected based on the match between a student's individual needs and the active components of EBIs. This pilot study tested the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of SIMS to match EBIs to students with externalizing behaviors. The investigators ran a double-masked randomized waitlist-controlled trial in a diverse urban district. Students at risk for externalizing behaviors were recruited and randomly assigned to the treatment (EBIs matched via SIMS) or control condition (mismatched social-skill training). Students received EBIs based on assigned condition for 10 weeks. Students' externalizing behaviors were assessed via a multi-method approach at baseline and 10-week posttest. Teachers rated the feasibility and acceptability of SIMS at 10-week posttest. The investigators used cluster-adjusted ANCOVAs to compare efficacy of matched EBIs via SIMS against that of the mismatched social skill training in reducing student externalizing behaviors.

Conditions Studied

Interventions

  • BEHAVIORAL Student Intervention Matching System (SIMS)
  • BEHAVIORAL group-based social skills training

Study Locations (1)

Minnesota

  • University of Minnesota-Twin Cities — Minneapolis

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 51 participants
Start Date 2018-08-25
Est. Completion 2018-12-01
Phase NA

Sponsor

University of Iowa

156 total trials

Interested in This Trial?

Always speak with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT05752942

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT05752942 describes a study currently listed as completed. It is categorized as NA, which is the standard way researchers label where a study sits along the investigational pathway from early safety work through later efficacy and post-marketing evaluation. The registered enrollment target is 51 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is University of Iowa, which has 156 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov, and sponsors are the parties responsible for study design, oversight, and regulatory filings.

The record links to 1 condition, with Problem;Behaviour;Child appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions — of which Student Intervention Matching System (SIMS) is the first listed. Interventions can include drugs, devices, procedures, behavioral programs, or observational arms, and each is tracked as a separate registry field so that downstream queries can filter accurately. When a trial lists multiple interventions, it usually reflects a multi-arm design or a comparison protocol rather than a single treatment being tested in isolation. The brief summary published in the registry is the clearest source of protocol intent and should be read before drawing conclusions from any sidebar tags.

Geographic footprint matters for practical reasons: NCT05752942 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area — top geographies include Minnesota. A larger site network tends to correlate with broader recruitment capacity, but it does not imply anything about study quality, and site-level enrollment status can diverge from the overall registry status shown above. Every data point on this page comes from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and is reproduced here for reference only; it is not a medical recommendation, an endorsement of the sponsor, or an invitation to enroll. Verify current status, eligibility criteria, and contact details directly at ClinicalTrials.gov, and discuss any participation decision with your own healthcare provider.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT05752942 about?

NCT05752942 is a clinical study titled "Precision-Based Approach to Matching Evidence-Based Interventions to Students With Externalizing Behaviors". Although prevalent across schools in the US, the "One-Size-Fits-All" (OSFA) approach to selecting evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for student externalizing behaviors often yields lackluster outcomes, due to the mismatch between the EBI and students' heterogeneous needs. Emerging literature highl...

What is the current status of trial NCT05752942?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 51 participants. The study started on 2018-08-25. Estimated completion is 2018-12-01.

What conditions does trial NCT05752942 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Problem;Behaviour;Child. These conditions were identified from the trial registry and reflect the primary focus areas of the research.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT05752942?

The interventions under investigation include: Student Intervention Matching System (SIMS) (BEHAVIORAL), group-based social skills training (BEHAVIORAL). Each intervention is being evaluated for safety and efficacy as part of this clinical study.

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT05752942?

This trial is sponsored by University of Iowa, which has 156 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The sponsor is responsible for the study's design, funding, and regulatory compliance.

Where is trial NCT05752942 being conducted?

This trial has 1 study location across Minnesota. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial