Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.
NCT05346406 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA
Comparing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters to Long Peripheral Catheters in Pediatrics
A NA study, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin.
- Completed
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 35
- Enrollment target
NCT05346406 is a NA study that has completed, run by Medical College of Wisconsin. The registered enrollment target is 35 participants.
The verdict
NCT05346406, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin.
- COMPLETED
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 35 participants
- Enrollment target
Study Summary
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) are frequently used in hospitalized children who require prolonged vascular access; however, concerns regarding their inappropriate use and contribution to serious complications such as central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) have triggered exploration of safer alternatives. Long Peripheral Catheters (LPCs) have been recently adopted by some institutions due to fewer complications as compared to PICCs. The investigators hypothesize that LPCs could be safer alternatives to PICCs for medium-term vascular access (5-14 days) in the appropriate cohort of hospitalized pediatric patients. The primary objective of the proposed clinical effectiveness pilot trial is to test the feasibility of a full-scale effectiveness trial comparing PICCs to LPCs in hospitalized pediatric patients. The investigators aim to identify a population in which LPCs are safe and effective alternatives to PICCs for medium-term, non-central vascular access; data that will inform the design of a full-scale effectiveness study. The investigators plan to engage patients and families as advisors in vascular access device selection by understanding their experience with vascular access device placement and maintenance. Over time, use of LPCs should result in decreased inappropriate PICC utilization with a concomitant decrease in serious complications such as CLABSI and VTE.
Interventions
- DEVICE Midline Catheter
- DEVICE Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
Trial Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Enrollment Target | 35 participants |
| Start Date | 2022-08-10 |
| Est. Completion | 2023-08-10 |
| Phase | NA |
Interested in This Trial?
Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT05346406
The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT05346406 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 35 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Medical College of Wisconsin, which has 447 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.
The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which Midline Catheter is the first listed.
NCT05346406 reports 0 study locations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is clinical trial NCT05346406 about?
NCT05346406 is a clinical study titled "Comparing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters to Long Peripheral Catheters in Pediatrics". Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) are frequently used in hospitalized children who require prolonged vascular access; however, concerns regarding their inappropriate use and contribution to serious complications such as central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and venous...
What is the current status of trial NCT05346406?
This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 35 participants. The study started on 2022-08-10. Estimated completion is 2023-08-10.
What interventions are being tested in trial NCT05346406?
The interventions under investigation include: Midline Catheter (DEVICE), Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (DEVICE).
Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT05346406?
This trial is sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin, which has 447 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Learn More About Clinical Trials
Explore more on PlainTrial
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.