Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT04203225 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · Phase 4

Comparison of Two Application Techniques for LET Gel

A Phase 4 study of Pain, Procedural and Lacerations, sponsored by Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.

Completed
Registry status
Phase 4
Development phase
48
Enrollment target
2
Study locations

NCT04203225 is a Phase 4 study of Pain, Procedural and Lacerations that has completed, run by Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center. The registered enrollment target is 48 participants, below the 104-participant average among 5 other Pain, Procedural trials with a reported enrollment target (54% lower). The trial reports 2 study locations across 1 state.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT04203225, a Phase 4 study of Pain, Procedural and Lacerations, has completed, sponsored by Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.

COMPLETED
Registry status
Phase 4
Development phase
48 participants
Enrollment target
2
Study locations

Study Summary

Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (LET) applied three times for 10 minutes each time vs. once for 30 minutes prior to suturing simple lacerations in children aged 7-17 years.

Interventions

  • DRUG LET Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel

Study Locations (2)

California

  • Children's Hospital of Orange County - Orange
  • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center - Torrance

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 48 participants
Start Date 2017-05-22
Est. Completion 2019-11-12
Phase Phase 4

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT04203225

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT04203225 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as Phase 4. The registered enrollment target is 48 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect, below the 104-participant average among 5 other Pain, Procedural trials with a reported enrollment target (54% lower). The listed sponsor is Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, which has 55 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 3 conditions, with Pain, Procedural appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 1 intervention - of which LET Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel is the first listed.

NCT04203225 reports 2 study locations spanning 1 distinct geographic area - top geographies include California.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT04203225 about?

NCT04203225 is a clinical study titled "Comparison of Two Application Techniques for LET Gel". Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (LET) applied three times for 10 minutes each time vs. once for 30 minutes prior to suturing simple lacerations in children aged 7-17 years.

What is the current status of trial NCT04203225?

This trial is currently completed. It is a Phase 4 study. The enrollment target is 48 participants. The study started on 2017-05-22. Estimated completion is 2019-11-12.

What conditions does trial NCT04203225 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Pain, Procedural, Lacerations, LET.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT04203225?

The interventions under investigation include: LET Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (DRUG).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT04203225?

This trial is sponsored by Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, which has 55 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Where is trial NCT04203225 being conducted?

This trial has 2 study locations across California. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Similar trials for Pain, Procedural

Matched on the same primary condition, ranked to surface studies in the same phase first, then by recruiting status, no relevance scoring or editorial curation.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.