An Integrated-Delivery-of-Care Approach to Improve Patient Outcomes, Safety, Well-Being After Orthopaedic Trauma

Study Summary

Orthopedic trauma is an unforeseen life-changing event. Nearly 2.8 million Americans sustain traumatic orthopedic injuries such as major fractures or amputation each year. Injury is treated in the hospital by physicians who medically stabilize and reconstruct the patient. Upon completion of their hospital stay, patients are discharged to begin their reintegration back into home and community activities. Despite high surgical success and survivorship rates, these injuries often result in poor quality of life (QOL)-related outcomes in otherwise healthy people. Fifty to ninety percent of patients develop severe psychological distress such as post-traumatic stress syndrome, depression or anxiety. Patients are often not provided the comprehensive support care and resources that are necessary to cope successfully with psychological stress and reintegrate into purposeful living. This is a major problem because high distress levels predict poor physical function, use of pain medications and low QOL. Survivors often cannot return to work, have persistent pain and experience social isolation. Distress worsens the self-perceptions of functional gain and efficacy and decreases personal fulfillment. Lingering psychological distress contributes to the development of other health problems and rebuilding of life is negatively impacted. The lack of psychosocial support contributes to injury re-occurrence, injury recidivism, re-hospitalizations and longer hospitalization stays, and higher personal and societal health care costs. There is currently a lack of comparative efficacy research to determine which delivery approach produces greater improvements in the outcomes that are most desired by patients, specifically, functional QOL and emotional well-being. The proposed research will directly compare these delivery-of-care approaches and measure the patient-reported outcomes that are considered important to patients.

Primary Outcome

Survey questionnaire measures the perception of Physical Function. Physical Function Average: t score = 50±10 Min: 10 Max: 90 A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Functional T-score of 60 is one SD better than average. By comparison, a Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.

Conditions Studied

Interventions

• OTHER Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System
• PROCEDURE Integrated care (ICare)
• PROCEDURE Usual Care (UsCare)
• OTHER Lower Extremity Gain Scale (LEGS)
• OTHER Dynamometer

Study Locations (1)