Organogenesis
Organogenesis sponsors 20 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 2 of them currently recruiting, and 14 completed. 8 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 3 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Venous Ulcer, with 3 trials.
Trial Pipeline
20 total, page 1 of 1
Clinical Trial Evaluating NuShield® Plus Standard of Care (SOC) Versus Standard of Care (SOC) Alone in the Management of Non-Healing Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs)
NCT07510412
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Purified Native Type 1 Collagen Extracellular Matrix With Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Antimicrobial (PCMP) and Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone in the Management of Nonhealing Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT06618612
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allograft in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT06000410
Efficacy of Amniotic Suspension Allograft in Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT04636229
PuraPly® AM Plus the Standard of Care to Standard of Care Alone for the Management of Stage II-IV Pressure Ulcers.
NCT03502824
Affinity Prospective Diabetic Foot Trial Crossover Group
NCT03205436
The RESPOND Registry
NCT03286452
Prospective PuraPly™ AM Case Series Study
NCT03070925
PuraPly™ Antimicrobial Wound Matrix and Wound Management
NCT03070938
Effect of Fresh Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT02880592
Safety Study of Gintuit™ in Subjects Requiring Socket Grafting
NCT01929954
A Post Marketing Study of Apligraf in Non-healing Wounds of Subjects With Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT01327937
Pivotal Trial of Dermagraft(R) to Treat Venous Leg Ulcers
NCT00909870
A Pilot Study of CelTx(TM) (Apligraf®) in the Treatment of Gingival Recession Requiring Root Coverage
NCT00679081
A Pilot Study of Apligraf for the Treatment and Prevention of Recurrence of Excised Keloids
NCT00587587
Safety and Efficacy of Apligraf in Nonhealing Wounds of Subjects With Junctional or Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB)
NCT00587223
Safety and Efficacy of Gintuit(TM)for Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration
NCT00587834
A Pilot Clinical Trial of Gintuit (TM)in Establishing a Functional Zone of Attached Gingiva
NCT01547962
Pivotal Trial of Dermagraft(R) to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01181453
Dermagraft(R) for the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
NCT01181440
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 3 |
| Phase 3 | 7 |
| Phase 4 | 1 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Organogenesis Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Organogenesis is linked to 20 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 2 studies are currently recruiting, about 10% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 14 are already marked complete, representing roughly 70% of the total.
The phase mix for Organogenesis reports 8 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 3 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Organogenesis is Venous Ulcer with 3 linked trials, and 9 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.