Meda Pharmaceuticals
Meda Pharmaceuticals sponsors 19 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 19 completed. 19 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 0 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, with 1 trials.
Trial Pipeline
19 total, page 1 of 1
Safety and Efficacy Trial of Dymista Nasal Spray in Children Ages 4 to 11 With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)
NCT01915823
Safety of Astepro 0.15% Nasal Spray and Astepro 0.1% Nasal Spray in Children Ages >6 Months to <6 Years With AR
NCT01880840
3 Month Safety Study of Dymista Nasal Spray and Fluticasone Propionate in Children 4-11 Years of Age With Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01794741
Open Label Safety Study of Xerese Cream in the Treatment of Recurrent Herpes Labialis in Children 6-11 Years Old
NCT01574612
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Nasal Spray to Treat Children With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01018862
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00883168
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00824473
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00740792
Study to Evaluate Two Formulations of Carisoprodol in Subjects With Musculoskeletal Spasm of the Lower Back
NCT00671879
A Study to Evaluate Two Formulations of Carisoprodol in Subjects With Musculoskeletal Spasm of the Lower Back
NCT00671502
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00651118
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00660517
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00660829
A Study to Evaluate the Safety & Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00719862
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Nasal Sprays to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT00720278
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of a Nasal Spray to Treat Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00720382
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray to Treat Perennial Allergies
NCT00712920
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a Nasal Spray to Treat Seasonal Allergies
NCT01368445
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of a Nasal Spray in Patients With Chronic Allergic or Nonallergic Rhinitis
NCT00783432
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 3 | 18 |
| Phase 4 | 1 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Meda Pharmaceuticals Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Meda Pharmaceuticals is linked to 19 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 19 are already marked complete, representing roughly 100% of the total.
The phase mix for Meda Pharmaceuticals reports 19 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Meda Pharmaceuticals is Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis with 1 linked trial, and 2 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.