Mead Johnson Nutrition
Mead Johnson Nutrition sponsors 34 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 27 completed. The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Healthy, with 2 trials.
Trial Pipeline
34 total, page 1 of 1
Extensively Hydrolyzed Formula Growth Monitioring Study (GMS)
NCT07513506
Feeding Study in VLBW Premature Infants
NCT05744193
Acceptance of a Partially Hydrolyzed Formula
NCT05245422
Growth and Tolerance of a Partially Hydrolyzed Infant Formula
NCT05047978
Nutritive Effects of Cow's Milk-Based Formulas Through 18 Months of Age
NCT04859231
Impact of Lactoferrin, a Dietary Supplement, vs. Placebo on Respiratory Tract Infections
NCT04713735
Gastrointestinal Tract Microbiome in Healthy Term Infants Receiving Mother'S-own Breast Milk or Cow's Milk-based Infant Formulas
NCT04059666
Acceptance Of A Partially-Hydrolyzed Infant Formula
NCT03223792
Early DHA Supplementation in Very Low Birth Weight Infants
NCT03192839
The Effect of Feeding Infant Formula With Enriched Protein Fractions in the US
NCT02433600
Growth and Tolerance of Cow's Milk-Based Infant Formulas
NCT02481531
Exploratory/Proof of Principle Microbiota Study
NCT02500563
Assessing Early Behavioral Indicators of Formula Tolerance
NCT02340143
The Effects on Growth and Tolerance of a Routine Infant Formula Fed to Term Infants
NCT02132663
Nutritive Effects of Prebiotics on Early Postnatal Behavioral Measures of Tolerance
NCT02118935
The Effects on Growth and Tolerance of an Infant Formula Fed to Term Infants
NCT01897922
The Effects of Feeding Different Levels of Docosahexaenoic Acid to Pre-School Children
NCT01897948
Effect of Carbohydrates From Nutritional Beverages in Children
NCT01355601
Growth and Tolerance of Hypoallergenic Formulas
NCT01354366
Growth and Tolerance of Cow Milk-Based Infant Formulas
NCT01122654
Investigation of A Children's Beverage Containing Different Probiotics
NCT00990002
Evaluation of Cow Milk-Based Formulas - Functional Proteins
NCT00916565
Allergy and Ashthma in Children Who Were Fed Supplemented Infant Formula
NCT01205659
Feeding Study in Premature Infants
NCT00681018
The Evaluation of Cow's Milk Formula - Study B
NCT00712608
The Effect of Infant Feeding on Stool Characteristics
NCT00503789
The Evaluation of Cow Milk-Based Formulas
NCT00518414
Evaluation of Mineral Absorption in Infants Fed Infant Formula
NCT00366873
Evaluation of Mineral Absorption in Infants Fed Infant Formula
NCT01177917
The Effects of Study Products Containing Varying Quantities of Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)
NCT01174134
Assessment of Feeding Tolerance in Infants Fed Cow Milk Formula
NCT00666120
The Evaluation of Infant Formulas Fed to Infants With Common Feeding Problems
NCT01934257
Allergy and Asthma Following Children Who Were Fed Supplemented Infant Formula
NCT00740974
Developmental Effects of Infant Formula Supplemented With LCPUFA
NCT00753818
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Mead Johnson Nutrition Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Mead Johnson Nutrition is linked to 34 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 27 are already marked complete, representing roughly 79% of the total.
The phase mix for Mead Johnson Nutrition reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Mead Johnson Nutrition is Healthy with 2 linked trials, and 4 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.