American Regent
American Regent sponsors 34 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 31 completed. 23 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 9 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Iron Deficiency Anemia, with 3 trials.
Trial Pipeline
34 total, page 1 of 1
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose in Pediatric Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia and Unsatisfactory Response Oral Iron Under Study Protocol 1VIT17044
NCT04269707
Multicenter Randomized Active-controlled Study to Investigate Efficacy & Safety of IV FCM in Pediatric Patients With IDA
NCT03523117
Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial of Ferric Carboxymaltose in RLS Patients With Iron-deficiency Anemia
NCT02826681
Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of FCM as Treatment for Heart Failure With Iron Deficiency / and Sub-Study
NCT03037931
Can Iron Lessen Anemia Due to Cancer and Chemotherapy: A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Injectafer®
NCT02453334
Blinded Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study Efficacy and Safety of Injectafer in ID Patients With Fibromyalgia
NCT02409459
Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy & Safety of Injectafer in the Treatment of RLS
NCT02397057
Registry to Evaluate Maintenance Treatment With Venofer in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT02492672
Observational Study on the Use of IV (Intravenous) Iron Therapy Among Subjects With Iron Deficiency Anemia
NCT01984554
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Efficacy of SPRIX in 12 to 17 Year Old Patients vs. Adult Patients Undergoing Open Surgical Procedures
NCT01819610
Blinded Cross-Over Bioequivalence (BE) Trial of Luitpold Azacitidine vs Vidaza
NCT01290302
Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)
NCT00982007
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia and Impaired Renal Function
NCT00981045
Intravenous Ferric Carboxymaltose vs IV Iron Sucrose or IV Iron Dextran in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Women
NCT01290315
Safety and Tolerability of Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Versus Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia
NCT00703937
Safety and Tolerability of Ferric Carboxymaltose (FCM) Versus Iron Dextran in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia
NCT00704028
Safety and Tolerability of a Single Dose of FCM vs. Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia
NCT00704353
Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Intranasal Ketorolac in Elderly and Nonelderly Adult Healthy Subjects
NCT01365624
Safety of FCM vs. Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Heavy Uterine Bleeding and Post Partum Patients
NCT00548860
Safety and Tolerability of FCM vs Standard of Care in Treating Iron Deficiency Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients
NCT00548691
Taxoprexin® Treatment for Advanced Primary Cancers of the Liver, Gallbladder or Biliary Tract
NCT00422877
Intravenous Iron Metabolism in Restless Legs Syndrome
NCT00685815
Safety and Efficacy of a Hematinic Agent in the Treatment of Postpartum Patients
NCT00354484
Iron Sucrose in Non-Dialysis Dependent (NDD-CKD) Pediatric Patients
NCT00721188
Taxoprexin Plus Carboplatin Treatment for Advanced Lung Cancer
NCT00243867
Taxoprexin® Treatment for Advanced Eye Melanoma
NCT00244816
Safety and Tolerability of Intravenous VIT-45 in Patients With Iron Deficiency Anemia
NCT00740246
Safety and Efficacy of Iron Sucrose in Children
NCT00239642
Long Term Safety Study of (VIT45) Extension Study: Treatment of Anemia in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT00317226
VIT45 Versus Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease
NCT00317239
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in the Treatment of Anemia Secondary to Heavy Uterine Bleeding
NCT00395993
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in Subjects Who Display Postpartum Anemia
NCT00396292
Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iron Versus Oral Iron in Chronic Renal Failure Subjects With Anemia
NCT00236977
Study of Taxoprexin Injection vs. Dacarbazine in Patients With Metastatic Malignant Melanoma
NCT00087776
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 2 |
| Phase 2 | 7 |
| Phase 3 | 22 |
| Phase 4 | 1 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for American Regent Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, American Regent is linked to 34 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 31 are already marked complete, representing roughly 91% of the total.
The phase mix for American Regent reports 23 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 9 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for American Regent is Iron Deficiency Anemia with 3 linked trials, and 7 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.