Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT05082948 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Migration Rates of Sutured vs Non-sutured Esophageal Stent Placement

A NA study, sponsored by West Virginia University.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
46
Enrollment target

NCT05082948: Completed NA study, sponsored by West Virginia University.

NCT05082948 is a NA study that has completed, run by West Virginia University. The registered enrollment target is 46 participants, below the 1,404-participant average among 58,714 other NA trials with a reported enrollment target (97% lower). According to ClinicalTrials.gov, the official US trial registry.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT05082948, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by West Virginia University.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
46 participants
Enrollment target

Study Summary

No standard approach currently exists for endoscopic esophageal stent placement, and both sutured and un-sutured techniques are employed for esophageal stent placement currently. The primary purpose of this study is to find out if suture fixation of esophageal stents is superior to non-suture fixated stent placement. Consecutive patients who are scheduled for esophageal stent placement will be identified as potential study participants by study personnel and will be approached on the day of the procedure. Informed consent will be obtained and patients will be randomized into suture fixation and non-suture fixation groups. Patients in the suture fixation group will have their esophageal stent secured in location with two endoscopic sutures. Those in the non-suture fixation group will have no sutures placed. Main study outcome is stent migration, and rates of stent migration will be compared in the two groups.

Primary Outcome

Stent migration will be defined as stent displacement of 20 mm or more from initial chest Xray. 20 mm has been taken as reference due to some fore-shortening that is expected with the stents, and to account for angulation and measurement related inter-radiograph variability. Inability to locate stent on chest radiograph or Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) will be defined as total stent dislodgement, which will be analyzed separately as well as included in the composite outcome.

Interventions

  • OTHER Suture fixation of stent
  • OTHER Non suture

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 46 participants
Start Date 2021-07-20
Est. Completion 2023-03-15
Phase NA
West Virginia University

122 total trials

What the finished NCT05082948 record still lists

NCT05082948 is an interventional study that assigns participants to a tested intervention. The registry caps enrollment at 46 participants, a relatively small participant target, below the 1,404-participant average among 58,714 other NA trials with a reported enrollment target (97% lower).

The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which Suture fixation of stent is the first listed.

NCT05082948 does not publish any study locations in the registry export this page uses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT05082948 about?

NCT05082948 is a clinical study titled "Migration Rates of Sutured vs Non-sutured Esophageal Stent Placement". No standard approach currently exists for endoscopic esophageal stent placement, and both sutured and un-sutured techniques are employed for esophageal stent placement currently. The primary purpose of this study is to find out if suture fixation of esophageal stents is superior to non-suture fixate...

What is the current status of trial NCT05082948?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 46 participants. The study started on 2021-07-20. Estimated completion is 2023-03-15.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT05082948?

The interventions under investigation include: Suture fixation of stent (OTHER), Non suture (OTHER).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT05082948?

This trial is sponsored by West Virginia University, which has 122 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How this trial's enrollment target compares

Where NCT05082948's enrollment target sits among peer trials

46 1402nd of 2000 higher than 590 of 2,000 other NA trials

participants (enrollment target), bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more other NA trials. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov registry export · 2026-08-08

Nationwide trials with similar profiles

Cross-condition peers matched on enrollment target and registry start date, not the same-condition list above.

Similar enrollment target

  • NCT01890590 · 46 participants · NA

    A Phase II Study of Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma

  • NCT03191149 · 46 participants · Phase 2

    Testing Osimertinib as a Treatment for Lung Cancers With an EGFR Exon 20 Change

  • NCT03510208 · 46 participants · Phase 1

    Panitumumab-IRDye800 in Diagnosing Participants With Malignant Glioma Undergoing Surgery

  • NCT04048278 · 46 participants · Early Phase 1

    Lidocaine Infusion in Pancreatic Cancer

Similar registry start date

  • NCT05962346 · started 2026-12 · NA

    Fetal Endoscopic Tracheal Occlusion for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

  • NCT07125183 · started 2026-12 · Phase 2

    Study on Efficacy and Tolerability of Weekly Doxorubicin in Elderly Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Leiomyosarcoma

  • NCT07292298 · started 2026-11 · Phase 2

    Phase 2 Single-Arm Rectal Cancer Brachytherapy for Patients With Low-Lying Residual Adenocarcinoma After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy to Improve Organ Preservation Rates

  • NCT04263285 · started 2026-10 · NA

    Treatment of Depression Post-SCI

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05082948, the US trial registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine. NCT05082948 (small enrollment · none site footprint · completed) retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial, see methodology.