Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.
NCT03486002 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA
Effexts OF THE Cleansweep Suction Catheter
A NA study, sponsored by Duke University.
- Terminated
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 8
- Enrollment target
NCT03486002 is a NA study that was terminated before completion, run by Duke University. The registered enrollment target is 8 participants.
The verdict
NCT03486002, a NA study, was terminated before completion, sponsored by Duke University.
- TERMINATED
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 8 participants
- Enrollment target
Study Summary
This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of a closed suction system with an inflatable balloon on the catheter (Cleansweep system) to that of a standard closed suction system in terms of reducing the interior resistance of endotracheal tubes. Subjects who require frequent suctioning ( \> every 2.5 hours) and who have stable cardiovascular systems will be randomized to receive suctioning either through the Cleansweep system or standard system initially followed by the corresponding system. The subjects will be suctioned every two hours for eight hours ( the first 2 suction procedures with one system followed by 2 with the other system). After each suction procedure measurements of resistance will be made using peak and plateau pressures. Analysis: For each patient, data for both procedures on each catheter system will be pooled and mean differences between the standard system and the Cleansweep system will be calculated. For all 20 patients the mean (+/- SD) of these differences will be calculated and significance will be sought using appropriate statistical tests. The study will be unblinded and randomization determines merely which system will used initially for the first 2 procedures.
Interventions
- DEVICE Cleansweep
- DEVICE Halyard
Trial Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Enrollment Target | 8 participants |
| Start Date | 2018-07-17 |
| Est. Completion | 2020-04-17 |
| Phase | NA |
Interested in This Trial?
Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT03486002
The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT03486002 describes a study currently listed as terminated, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 8 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Duke University, which has 1,725 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.
The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which Cleansweep is the first listed.
NCT03486002 reports 0 study locations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is clinical trial NCT03486002 about?
NCT03486002 is a clinical study titled "Effexts OF THE Cleansweep Suction Catheter". This study is designed to compare the effectiveness of a closed suction system with an inflatable balloon on the catheter (Cleansweep system) to that of a standard closed suction system in terms of reducing the interior resistance of endotracheal tubes. Subjects who require frequent suctioning ( \> ...
What is the current status of trial NCT03486002?
This trial is currently terminated. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 8 participants. The study started on 2018-07-17. Estimated completion is 2020-04-17.
What interventions are being tested in trial NCT03486002?
The interventions under investigation include: Cleansweep (DEVICE), Halyard (DEVICE).
Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT03486002?
This trial is sponsored by Duke University, which has 1,725 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Learn More About Clinical Trials
Explore more on PlainTrial
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.