Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.
NCT02150083 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA
Trial of Two Techniques to Assess Postoperative Voiding Function
A NA study, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
- Completed
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 59
- Enrollment target
NCT02150083 is a NA study that has completed, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. The registered enrollment target is 59 participants.
The verdict
NCT02150083, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
- COMPLETED
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 59 participants
- Enrollment target
Study Summary
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition that affects up to 35% of women. Many surgical procedures have been developed to treat SUI, and midurethral slings have gradually become the first line treatment. Voiding dysfunction, or inability for a patient to empty her bladder, immediately after surgery is common. A bladder test is often performed in the recovery area to see if the patient is able to empty her bladder. This typically consists of filling the bladder with 300 mL of saline through the foley catheter. The catheter is then removed and the patient is asked to void. The investigators then measure the voided volume and the residual left inside the bladder to determine if she is able to empty her bladder sufficiently or not. A successful voiding trial is defined as voiding 2/3 of the total volume in the bladder and having less than 100 mL left inside the bladder as residual. Our goal of this study was to evaluate efficiency and effectiveness of a retrograde postoperative voiding trial that is initiated in the operating room. Our hypothesis was that a retrograde postoperative voiding trial initiated in the operating room would be as effective as a standard retrograde postoperative voiding trial to predict postoperative voiding dysfunction while allowing for patients to spend less time in the recovery unit.
Interventions
- PROCEDURE OR retrograde fill
Trial Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Enrollment Target | 59 participants |
| Start Date | 2011-11 |
| Est. Completion | 2014-04 |
| Phase | NA |
Interested in This Trial?
Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT02150083
The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT02150083 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 59 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, which has 1,109 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.
The record links to 0 conditions, and to 1 intervention - of which OR retrograde fill is the first listed.
NCT02150083 reports 0 study locations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is clinical trial NCT02150083 about?
NCT02150083 is a clinical study titled "Trial of Two Techniques to Assess Postoperative Voiding Function". Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common condition that affects up to 35% of women. Many surgical procedures have been developed to treat SUI, and midurethral slings have gradually become the first line treatment. Voiding dysfunction, or inability for a patient to empty her bladder, immediately...
What is the current status of trial NCT02150083?
This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 59 participants. The study started on 2011-11. Estimated completion is 2014-04.
What interventions are being tested in trial NCT02150083?
The interventions under investigation include: OR retrograde fill (PROCEDURE).
Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT02150083?
This trial is sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, which has 1,109 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Learn More About Clinical Trials
Explore more on PlainTrial
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.