Two Pneumatic Compression Devices in the Treatment of Lower Extremity Lymphedema

Study Summary

The treatment of lymphedema has been a major focus of attention for physicians and scientists for several decades. At this time, no successful techniques have been developed to prevent lymphedema, and therefore, a great deal of emphasis is placed on treatment modalities that can lessen the severity and impede the progression of this debilitating condition. The treatment on offer usually consists of a maintenance phase using compression garments and an intensive treatment phase, which includes the use of skin care, compression bandaging, exercise and manual lymphatic drainage (MLD). The intensive phase is usually described as complex decongestive therapy (CDT). This is time consuming and requires high resource usage. Pneumatic compression devices (PCD) offer and alternative to MLD and can be used by the patient. There are a number of devices on the market that are categorized into 1. without calibrated gradient compression 2. With calibrated gradient compression. This trial will compare two PCDs, a simple device without calibrated compression, and an advanced device with calibrated compression, in the reduction of swelling and maintenance of reduced limb volume in 262 patients with lower limb lymphoedema. The primary end point will be limb volume reduction over 12 weeks of treatment, with secondary outcome after 24 weeks.

Primary Outcome

Limb volume in ml as assessed using the tape measure method of collecting circumferential leg measurements to insert into the truncated cone formula for limb volume calculation. A positive score indicates volume reduction between baseline and the noted follow-up, while a negative score indicates volume increase.

Interventions

• DEVICE Flexitouch System
• DEVICE Hydroven FPR