Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.
NCT00724750 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA
Comparison of Two Methods of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
A NA study of Acute Wounds From Trauma and Dehiscence or Surgical Complications, sponsored by University of Chicago.
- Completed
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 87
- Enrollment target
- 1
- Study location
NCT00724750 is a NA study of Acute Wounds From Trauma and Dehiscence or Surgical Complications that has completed, run by University of Chicago. The registered enrollment target is 87 participants. The trial reports 1 study location across 1 state.
The verdict
NCT00724750, a NA study of Acute Wounds From Trauma and Dehiscence or Surgical Complications, has completed, sponsored by University of Chicago.
- COMPLETED
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 87 participants
- Enrollment target
- 1
- Study location
Study Summary
The current standard for negative pressure wound therapy is the Vacuum Assisted Closure Device (VAC), a commercial system that utilizes a computerized suction pump to apply negative pressure to an open-cell poly-urethane foam dressing sealed over a wound. The VAC system is effective but has some drawbacks: * The system is expensive. * There us conflicting data about the effectiveness of VAC therapy for infected wounds. * VAC therapy is difficult to use (and frequently fails) in wounds with excess fluid drainage, and in wounds near body orifices. Over the past 4 years, we have accumulated additional experience with negative pressure wound therapy using wall suction applied to sealed gauze dressings with about 30 patients. We call this method G-SUC and have used it when we have been unable to maintain a dressing seal with the VAC system (due to excess drainage or wound location), for management if infected wounds. We have found this method to be effective without any specific negative side effects. Our specific aims are: 1. Compare the effectiveness of G-SUC and standard VAC therapy. Outcomes measured for each method will include the proportional change in wound size over 1 - 2 weeks. 2. Compare the effectiveness of G-SUC and VAC system in controlling wound infections as measured by the number of patients who are able to clear infection by 4 days. 3. Compare the failure of each method of therapy by documenting the number of dressing that cannot be maintained because of fluid or suction. 4. Measure and compare the cost of wound treatment with the two methods including direct cost and time spent at the bed side performing the dressing change. Our hypotheses are: 1. G-SUC and VAC are equivalent for the treatment of uncomplicated wounds in the acute care, in-patient setting. 2. G-SUC is more effective than VAC for management of infected wounds. 3. G-SUC is more versatile than VAC, and functional G-SUC dressings can be maintained in situations where functional VAC dr
Conditions Studied
Interventions
- DEVICE Gauze suction (G-SUC)
- DEVICE Vacuum Assisted Closure Device (VAC)
Study Locations (1)
Illinois
- University of Chicago Medical Center - Chicago
Trial Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Enrollment Target | 87 participants |
| Start Date | 2006-07 |
| Est. Completion | 2008-05 |
| Phase | NA |
Interested in This Trial?
Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT00724750
The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT00724750 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 87 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is University of Chicago, which has 796 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.
The record links to 2 conditions, with Acute Wounds From Trauma appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions - of which Gauze suction (G-SUC) is the first listed.
NCT00724750 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area - top geographies include Illinois.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is clinical trial NCT00724750 about?
NCT00724750 is a clinical study titled "Comparison of Two Methods of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy". The current standard for negative pressure wound therapy is the Vacuum Assisted Closure Device (VAC), a commercial system that utilizes a computerized suction pump to apply negative pressure to an open-cell poly-urethane foam dressing sealed over a wound. The VAC system is effective but has some dra...
What is the current status of trial NCT00724750?
This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 87 participants. The study started on 2006-07. Estimated completion is 2008-05.
What conditions does trial NCT00724750 study?
This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Acute Wounds From Trauma, Dehiscence or Surgical Complications.
What interventions are being tested in trial NCT00724750?
The interventions under investigation include: Gauze suction (G-SUC) (DEVICE), Vacuum Assisted Closure Device (VAC) (DEVICE).
Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT00724750?
This trial is sponsored by University of Chicago, which has 796 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Where is trial NCT00724750 being conducted?
This trial has 1 study location across Illinois. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.
Learn More About Clinical Trials
Explore more on PlainTrial
Acute Wounds From Trauma
All registered trials for this condition
Dehiscence or Surgical Complications
All registered trials for this condition
Illinois
All trials with a study site in Illinois
Recruiting now
Find trials open to new participants near you
Rankings
Top sponsors, conditions, and phases
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.