ORA
ORA sponsors 19 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 18 completed. 4 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 4 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Allergic Conjunctivitis, with 4 trials.
Trial Pipeline
19 total, page 1 of 1
Efficacy and Safety of PL9643 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye
NCT04268069
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of PRT-2761 for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT03320434
Visual Function Tests in Age-related Macular Degeneration
NCT03275753
Safety and Efficacy of TOP1630 for Dry Eye Syndrome
NCT03088605
Flicker Fusion Thresholds Between Young and Old Subjects at Various Luminance Levels
NCT03079570
Food Allergy Diagnostic Test Response to Previous Oral Challenge Response
NCT03693456
Food Allergy Challenge Diagnostic Study
NCT02606721
Study Evaluating Nasal Symptoms Induced by a Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) To House Dust Mite Allergen
NCT01936818
Mucin Levels in Dry Eye and Normal Populations
NCT05911555
Evaluation of Prednisolone in a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model
NCT01730872
Effect of Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) on Tear Film Stability
NCT01547936
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Topical Ophthalmic Steroids in a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model
NCT01534195
An Allergen BioCube (ABC) Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray Compared to Placebo
NCT01439815
A Single-Center Pilot Study to Assess Macular Function
NCT01204541
Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Following Allergen Exposure in the Allergen BioCube (ABC)
NCT00985296
A Pilot Study Evaluating the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis Following Exposure in the Allergen BioCube
NCT00985075
A Single-Center Evaluation of the Pattern of Allergic Signs and Symptoms During 4 Weeks in Ragweed Season
NCT00982163
Safety and Efficacy Study of a Testosterone Eye Drop for the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
NCT00755183
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Topical Ophthalmic Steroids in a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge (CAC) Model
NCT00689078
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 2 | 4 |
| Phase 4 | 4 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for ORA Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, ORA is linked to 19 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 18 are already marked complete, representing roughly 95% of the total.
The phase mix for ORA reports 4 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 4 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for ORA is Allergic Conjunctivitis with 4 linked trials, and 0 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.