Mathematica Policy Research
Trial Pipeline
Evaluation of the Primary Care First Model
NCT06617533
Home-Based Child Care Toolkit for Nurturing School-Age Children Study
NCT06329778
American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (AIAN FACES 2019)
NCT04046965
Testing the Effectiveness of Behavioral Text Messages to Promote Attendance at HMRE Sessions
NCT02787460
Impact Evaluation of MotherWise Program
NCT02792309
Testing Relationship Skills Education Services With a Robust Economic Security Component
NCT02902003
Impacts of the Positive Youth Development Program for Expectant and Parenting Teens in California
NCT04181034
American Indian and Alaska Native Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey
NCT03842111
Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES 2014)
NCT03705377
Evaluation of the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative
NCT02320591
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Teen Options to Prevent Pregnancy (T.O.P.P.) Program
NCT01456793
Cost Effectiveness of Language Services in Hospital Emergency Departments (EDs)
NCT01041014
What the Pipeline for Mathematica Policy Research Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Mathematica Policy Research is linked to 12 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting — about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio — and 11 are already marked complete, representing roughly 92% of the total. Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
The phase mix for Mathematica Policy Research reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2). A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work — safety, dosing, and early signal detection — and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Mathematica Policy Research is Head Start Participation with 3 linked trials, and 9 other condition areas appear in the top list above. That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice — verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.