Bp Consulting

10 total trials 10 completed

Bp Consulting sponsors 10 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, none currently recruiting, and 10 completed. 10 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 0 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Comfort, Vision and Wear Time, with 1 trials.

Trial Pipeline

10 total, page 1 of 1

COMPLETED Phase 4

Evaluation of Comfort With Xibrom (Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution)0.09% and Nevanac (Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension) 0.1% Following Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty (SLT)

NCT00828477

COMPLETED Phase 4

Randomized, Double Blind Trial of Bromfenac BID (0.09%) as an Adjunct to Argon Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.

NCT00758628

COMPLETED Phase 4

Determination of Optimum Duration of Treatment With Bromfenac (Xibrom) Eyedrops Following Cataract Surgery

NCT00758199

COMPLETED Phase 4

Comparison of Istalol™ 0.5% QD (Timolol Maleate/Sorbitol Complex, ISTA Pharmaceutical) to Brimonidine Tartrate 0.1% BID as Adjunctive Therapy to Latanoprost 0.005% in Adults With Ocular Hypertension (OHT) or Open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG)

NCT00698945

COMPLETED Phase 4

Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and Visual Acuity Outcomes in Subjects Undergoing Cataract Surgery, Who Receive Xibrom Ophthalmic Solution and Standard Presurgical Care vs. Xibrom Ophthalmic Solution Plus Prednisolone Acetate 1% and Standard Presurgical Care

NCT00698724

COMPLETED Phase 4

Masked Comparison of a New PEG Based Artificial Tear and Optive for Comfort, Vision & Wear Time in Patients Wearing Contact Lenses

NCT00570843

COMPLETED Phase 4

Efficacy of PEG-400 and Systane Artificial Tears (Alcon) on Quality of Vision

NCT00627302

COMPLETED Phase 4

Bilateral, Masked Comparison of PEG-400 Based Artificial Tear and Systane for the Treatment of Dry Eye Signs, Symptoms and Visual Quality

NCT00622037

COMPLETED Phase 4

Bilateral, Masked Comparison of PEG-400 Based Artificial Tear vs. Systane for Dry Eye Signs, Symptoms & Refractive Regression Associated With Myopic Laser in Situ Keratomilieusis (LASIK).

NCT00620893

COMPLETED Phase 4

Treatment of Acute Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema: Bromfenac 0.09% Versus Diclofenac Sodium 0.1% Versus Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.5%

NCT00595543

Phase Distribution

PhaseTrial count
Phase 4 10

What the Pipeline for Bp Consulting Shows

According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Bp Consulting is linked to 10 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 0 studies are currently recruiting, about 0% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 10 are already marked complete, representing roughly 100% of the total.

The phase mix for Bp Consulting reports 10 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).

The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Bp Consulting is Comfort, Vision and Wear Time with 1 linked trial, and 3 other condition areas appear in the top list above.

How to read these pipeline numbers

Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.

A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.

That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.