Medical Information Only. Consult your healthcare provider before considering clinical trial enrollment.

ClinicalTrials.gov official registry

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca clinical trials

Every US clinical trial registered for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca — phase mix, recruiting status, and the sponsors running them, straight from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry.

10 US clinical trials ·

The research picture

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca has 10 registered US clinical trials; none are currently listed as recruiting, so most are completed or in follow-up.

0
recruiting participants now
0%
of trials open to enrollment
2
in Phase 3–4 (later-stage)
1
top sponsor: Oculeve

Counts reflect the public ClinicalTrials.gov registry as last mirrored by PlainTrial. Status and phase are reported by each study's sponsor. This is reference information, not medical advice.

Active & Recent Trials

COMPLETED Phase 2 440 participants

Safety and Efficacy of Pimecrolimus Ophthalmic Suspension in Patients With Moderate to Severe Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Novartis

NCT00128245

COMPLETED Phase 3 400 participants

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Tavilermide (MIM-D3) Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease

Mimetogen Pharmaceuticals USA

NCT02665234

COMPLETED 314 participants

TearLab Core Validation Study to Establish Referent Values for Dry Eye Disease

TearLab Corporation

NCT00848198

COMPLETED Phase 2 220 participants

Safety and Efficacy Study of Rebamipide 2% Ophthalmic Suspension in Patients With Dry Eye

Kubota Vision

NCT01027013

COMPLETED NA 55 participants

Acute Tear Production Following Single Use of the Oculeve Intranasal Neurostimulator

Oculeve

NCT02798289

COMPLETED Phase 1 35 participants

A Dose-Escalation Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of LX214 Ophthalmic Solution in Healthy Volunteers, Followed by an Open-Label Evaluation of LX214 in Patients With Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca (KCS)

Lux Biosciences

NCT00851734

COMPLETED Phase 2 30 participants

Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome With Cyclosporin A Eye Drops

National Eye Institute (NEI)

NCT00001731

COMPLETED Phase 2 23 participants

Dry Eye Assessment and Management: Feasibility Study

Asbell, Penny, M.D.

NCT01102257

COMPLETED Phase 4 20 participants

Effects of Dry Eye Treatments on the Ocular Surface

Baylor College of Medicine

NCT01797822

COMPLETED NA 12 participants

Effects of Systane Versus Saline in Maintaining Tear Film Stability at Determined Time Points

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

NCT00345241

Phase Distribution

PhaseTrial count
Phase 1 1
Phase 2 4
Phase 3 1
Phase 4 1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, National Library of Medicine. Data is informational only.

Reading the Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca Trial Landscape

ClinicalTrials.gov lists 10 US studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, and 0 of those are currently open to recruitment — roughly 0% of the total volume on the registry. That ratio is a useful proxy for activity level: a high share of recruiting studies often signals that research interest is current and that new enrollment opportunities are appearing, while a low share typically means the field is dominated by completed or follow-up work where most participant spots have already been filled. These counts reflect the public registry only and include studies at every stage of design, so they should be read as an index of research attention rather than as a measure of treatment availability.

The phase distribution for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca shows 2 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) alongside 5 earlier-phase entries (Phase 1 through Phase 2). Phase 1 and Phase 2 studies focus on early safety signals, dosing, and preliminary effect, while Phase 3 studies are typically the larger efficacy and safety trials submitted toward regulatory review, and Phase 4 studies follow approved interventions in real-world use. A condition weighted toward later phases often reflects a mature research pipeline with several interventions already close to or past approval, whereas a heavier early-phase tilt suggests the field is still exploring new mechanisms and candidate approaches.

Top sponsor activity for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca is led by Oculeve with 1 indexed trial, alongside 9 other organizations in the top contributor list. The list on this page surfaces up to 10 of the most relevant recent and active entries, ordered with recruiting studies first so practical options are visible. All figures are derived from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset maintained by the National Library of Medicine and are reproduced here for reference. Inclusion of a trial, sponsor, or intervention on this page is neither an endorsement nor a recommendation — eligibility, protocol changes, and site-level status can shift frequently, so always verify current details on ClinicalTrials.gov and consult a qualified healthcare provider before acting on anything you see here.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many clinical trials are there for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca?

PlainTrial tracks 10 US clinical trials for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, of which 0 are currently recruiting participants. Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov.

How do I find a recruiting trial for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca?

Use the trial list above filtered by "Recruiting" status, or visit our trial finder at /recruiting to search by condition and state. Always discuss trial participation with your healthcare provider before enrolling.

Is this data current?

Data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and reflects our most recent data pull. Trial status may have changed since then. Always verify current information at ClinicalTrials.gov before making decisions about participation.

Related

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (National Library of Medicine). Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM) ClinicalTrials.gov AACT registry · 2026 Trial counts and statuses sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. Sponsor counts include both industry and federal/academic sponsors.

Verify with NIH →