Pivotal, Prospective, Multi-centre, Single-arm Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Oli for Identification of Patients, During the Intrapartum Period, Who Are at Higher Risk of Developing Abnormal Postpartum Uterine Bleeding, Including Postpartum Haemorrhage

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT06655207

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT06655207 describes a study currently listed as recruiting. It is categorized as NA, which is the standard way researchers label where a study sits along the investigational pathway from early safety work through later efficacy and post-marketing evaluation. The registered enrollment target is 1,000 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Baymatob Operations Pty, which has 1 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov, and sponsors are the parties responsible for study design, oversight, and regulatory filings.

The record links to 3 conditions, with High Risk Pregnancy appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 1 intervention — of which Oli is a non-invasive, wearable device, designed to provide clinicians with an early indication if the participant is at a higher risk of developing abnormal postpartum uterine bleeding is the first listed. Interventions can include drugs, devices, procedures, behavioral programs, or observational arms, and each is tracked as a separate registry field so that downstream queries can filter accurately. When a trial lists multiple interventions, it usually reflects a multi-arm design or a comparison protocol rather than a single treatment being tested in isolation. The brief summary published in the registry is the clearest source of protocol intent and should be read before drawing conclusions from any sidebar tags.

Geographic footprint matters for practical reasons: NCT06655207 reports 7 study locations spanning 6 distinct geographic areas — top geographies include New South Wales, Colorado, Louisiana. A larger site network tends to correlate with broader recruitment capacity, but it does not imply anything about study quality, and site-level enrollment status can diverge from the overall registry status shown above. Every data point on this page comes from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and is reproduced here for reference only; it is not a medical recommendation, an endorsement of the sponsor, or an invitation to enroll. Verify current status, eligibility criteria, and contact details directly at ClinicalTrials.gov, and discuss any participation decision with your own healthcare provider.