Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT06261437 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Effect of Ration Formulations on Warfighter Energy Balance and Physical Performance During a Field Training Exercise

A NA study, sponsored by United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
60
Enrollment target

NCT06261437 is a NA study that has completed, run by United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine. The registered enrollment target is 60 participants.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT06261437, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
60 participants
Enrollment target

Study Summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the effects of consuming the Close Combat Assault Ration (CCAR) compared to the First Strike Ration (FSR) during a 7-day strenuous military training on energy intake and energy balance in healthy, Active Duty Warfighters. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Will consuming the CCAR result in lower energy intake or energy balance compared to consumption of the FSR? * Will consuming the CCAR result in lower lower body strength or anaerobic power compared to consuming the FSR? * Will those consuming the CCAR report lower ration acceptability or greater gastrointestinal side effects compared to those consuming the FSR? Participants will be asked to consume either the CCAR or FSR as the sole nutrition source during a 7-day field training exercise (FTX). The vertical jump test, running-based anaerobic sprint test, and lower-body strength pull will be conducted pre and post the 7-day FTX to assess physical performance. Energy expenditure and intake will be measured by the doubly-labelled water method and dietary logs, respectively. Surveys will be completed to assess ration acceptability and gastrointestinal symptoms. Researchers will compare the CCAR and FSR groups to see if their consumption impacted energy intake, energy balance, physical performance, ration acceptance, or gastrointestinal side effects.

Interventions

  • OTHER CCAR
  • OTHER FSR

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 60 participants
Start Date 2024-02-22
Est. Completion 2024-03-04
Phase NA

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT06261437

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT06261437 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 60 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, which has 59 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which CCAR is the first listed.

NCT06261437 reports 0 study locations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT06261437 about?

NCT06261437 is a clinical study titled "Effect of Ration Formulations on Warfighter Energy Balance and Physical Performance During a Field Training Exercise". The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to determine the effects of consuming the Close Combat Assault Ration (CCAR) compared to the First Strike Ration (FSR) during a 7-day strenuous military training on energy intake and energy balance in healthy, Active Duty Warfighters. The main questions...

What is the current status of trial NCT06261437?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 60 participants. The study started on 2024-02-22. Estimated completion is 2024-03-04.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT06261437?

The interventions under investigation include: CCAR (OTHER), FSR (OTHER).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT06261437?

This trial is sponsored by United States Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, which has 59 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.