Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT03100435 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in Decontamination of Dental Implants: An In-Vitro Study

A NA study, sponsored by Tufts University.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
8
Enrollment target

NCT03100435 is a NA study that has completed, run by Tufts University. The registered enrollment target is 8 participants.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT03100435, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by Tufts University.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
8 participants
Enrollment target

Study Summary

The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons estimated that 69% of adults ages 35 to 44 have lost at least one permanent tooth. Dental implants have revolutionized dentistry by providing tooth-like replacement for missing teeth and a solution that is predictable with long-term success.. After the implant is placed, natural bacteria from the mouth can develop around implants just like around natural teeth. Studies have shown that bacterial contamination can cause peri-implantitis- gum disease or inflammation around the implant, eventually leading to bone loss. Removing bacteria from dental implant surfaces can prevent peri-implantitis, and surface debridement constitutes the basis of treatment of peri-implant disease. Typically, mechanical hand instrumentation using curettes to remove biofilm and calculus is the main basis for periodontal therapy. However, total debridement is difficult, and the hand tools may damage the surface of the implant and making it more plaque retentive. Studies have shown that mechanical non-surgical therapy alone is not sufficient to treat peri-implantitis. There is evidence that a dental laser may be an effective method to remove bacteria from implant surfaces, with less damage to the surface. One type of dental laser, Er:YAG, appears optimal for implant decontamination as the Er:YAG laser energy is primarily absorbed by water, resulting in vaporization of bacteria and minimal surface alterations on the implant surface.The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of biofilm decontamination of Er:YAG laser compared to carbon fiber curette.

Interventions

  • DEVICE Er:YAG Laser
  • OTHER Carbon Fiber Curette

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 8 participants
Start Date 2017-04-20
Est. Completion 2018-10-18
Phase NA

Sponsor

Tufts University

163 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT03100435

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT03100435 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 8 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Tufts University, which has 163 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which Er:YAG Laser is the first listed.

NCT03100435 reports 0 study locations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT03100435 about?

NCT03100435 is a clinical study titled "Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in Decontamination of Dental Implants: An In-Vitro Study". The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons estimated that 69% of adults ages 35 to 44 have lost at least one permanent tooth. Dental implants have revolutionized dentistry by providing tooth-like replacement for missing teeth and a solution that is predictable with long-term success...

What is the current status of trial NCT03100435?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 8 participants. The study started on 2017-04-20. Estimated completion is 2018-10-18.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT03100435?

The interventions under investigation include: Er:YAG Laser (DEVICE), Carbon Fiber Curette (OTHER).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT03100435?

This trial is sponsored by Tufts University, which has 163 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.