Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT02548104 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Analgesic Efficacy of Anterior Femoral, Genicular and Adductor Canal Nerve Block

A NA study, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
42
Enrollment target

NCT02548104 is a NA study that has completed, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. The registered enrollment target is 42 participants.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT02548104, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
42 participants
Enrollment target

Study Summary

Recently, more distal approach to femoral nerve branches (saphenous) in the adductor canal in the medial compartment of the thigh have shown to provide comparable anesthesia and analgesia without quadriceps muscle weakness than traditional femoral nerve blocks (FNB) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Adductor canal block (ACB) has the unique advantage of providing localized analgesia to the peripatellar and intra-articular aspects of the knee joint without reducing the patient's ability to perform a straight leg raise. However, it does not adequately address the incisional pain component on the anterior surface of the knee innervated by anterior femoral cutaneous nerve. This pain may be improved by addition of the anterior femoral block (AFB). Additionally, the ACB does not provide analgesia to the posterior aspect of the knee, which is commonly moderate to severe after surgery. This pain may be decreased by addition of the genicular block, also known as the iPACK block (interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee). There is no study that has evaluated the potentially analgesic benefits of the AFB or the iPACK block combined with ACB after TKA. Therefore, the investigators designed this randomized, prospective, and double-blinded study to assess our hypothesis that the addition of the AFB and/or iPACK block to the ACB will improve analgesic effects, decrease pain scores, deceased opioid requirement, and as well as facilitate early recovery and improve patient satisfaction with pain management in patient after TKA.

Interventions

  • OTHER ACB
  • OTHER ACB + iPACK

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 42 participants
Start Date 2017-10-01
Est. Completion 2023-11-06
Phase NA

Sponsor

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

339 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT02548104

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT02548104 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 42 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, which has 339 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which ACB is the first listed.

NCT02548104 reports 0 study locations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT02548104 about?

NCT02548104 is a clinical study titled "Analgesic Efficacy of Anterior Femoral, Genicular and Adductor Canal Nerve Block". Recently, more distal approach to femoral nerve branches (saphenous) in the adductor canal in the medial compartment of the thigh have shown to provide comparable anesthesia and analgesia without quadriceps muscle weakness than traditional femoral nerve blocks (FNB) after total knee arthroplasty (TK...

What is the current status of trial NCT02548104?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 42 participants. The study started on 2017-10-01. Estimated completion is 2023-11-06.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT02548104?

The interventions under investigation include: ACB (OTHER), ACB + iPACK (OTHER).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT02548104?

This trial is sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, which has 339 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.