Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.
NCT02096978 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA
Comparing Implant Stability Using Two Accepted Techniques for Implant Sites
A NA study, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
- Completed
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 17
- Enrollment target
NCT02096978 is a NA study that has completed, run by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. The registered enrollment target is 17 participants.
The verdict
NCT02096978, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
- COMPLETED
- Registry status
- NA
- Development phase
- 17 participants
- Enrollment target
Study Summary
The study will be conducted to compare two alternative techniques for dental implant placement. Both of the techniques - Osteotome and Conventional Drilling Techniques for the preparation of the implant sites (osteotomies) are accepted standards of care. The goal of the study will be to compare implant stabilities achieved with two techniques by measuring resonance frequency for each implant placed using the diagnostic device, the Osstell machine, that measures "stiffness" of the bone/implant system non-invasively. The data are represented in a quantitative value - implant stability quotient (ISQ), where a higher value indicated a higher implant stability. Since it has been well documented in the scientific literature that primary (at the time of implant placement) implant stability is a strong prerequisite for implant success (osseointegration and subsequent function on loading), the results of this study will guide the implant team in choosing the right surgical treatment protocol - the protocol that will be aimed for higher implant stability, and, therefore, for higher long-term implant success.
Interventions
- PROCEDURE Preparing the osteotomy to accept a standard implant device
Trial Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Enrollment Target | 17 participants |
| Start Date | 2010-10 |
| Est. Completion | 2013-04 |
| Phase | NA |
Interested in This Trial?
Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT02096978
The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT02096978 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 17 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, which has 413 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.
The record links to 0 conditions, and to 1 intervention - of which Preparing the osteotomy to accept a standard implant device is the first listed.
NCT02096978 reports 0 study locations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is clinical trial NCT02096978 about?
NCT02096978 is a clinical study titled "Comparing Implant Stability Using Two Accepted Techniques for Implant Sites". The study will be conducted to compare two alternative techniques for dental implant placement. Both of the techniques - Osteotome and Conventional Drilling Techniques for the preparation of the implant sites (osteotomies) are accepted standards of care. The goal of the study will be to compare impl...
What is the current status of trial NCT02096978?
This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 17 participants. The study started on 2010-10. Estimated completion is 2013-04.
What interventions are being tested in trial NCT02096978?
The interventions under investigation include: Preparing the osteotomy to accept a standard implant device (PROCEDURE).
Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT02096978?
This trial is sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, which has 413 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Learn More About Clinical Trials
Explore more on PlainTrial
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.