Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT01556581 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Comparative Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain

A NA study, sponsored by Madigan Army Medical Center.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
119
Enrollment target

NCT01556581: Completed NA study, sponsored by Madigan Army Medical Center.

NCT01556581 is a NA study that has completed, run by Madigan Army Medical Center. The registered enrollment target is 119 participants, below the 1,404-participant average among 58,714 other NA trials with a reported enrollment target (92% lower). According to ClinicalTrials.gov, the official US trial registry.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT01556581, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by Madigan Army Medical Center.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
119 participants
Enrollment target

Study Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two management strategies for patients with a recent onset of low back pain (LBP). One is based on usual care and the other is based on early access to physical therapy following a pragmatic treatment-based classification approach. The secondary purposes are to compare the subsequent healthcare utilization associated with two management strategies as well as to evaluate the importance of psychosocial factors on outcomes within both groups of treatment. The overall hypothesis guiding the study is that the additional initial treatment expense incurred by early implementation will result in superior short-term clinical effectiveness, and will be more cost-effective in the long-term due to reduced healthcare utilization. We will also explore the importance of psychosocial factors on outcomes within both treatment groups, which may provide insights for further improving treatment strategies.

Primary Outcome

The Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (OSW) is a 10-item condition-specific measure of functional status (pain and disability) for patients with low back pain (LBP). Each question has 6 possible answers (0 = worse, 5 = best). The raw score is doubled to provide a percent score from 0 to 100%; with 0 equaling no disability and 100% equalling the worst possible outcome. It measures pain-related disability. We used the modified version that replaces the sex life item with an employment/ ho

Interventions

  • PROCEDURE Usual Care (UC)
  • PROCEDURE Early Physical Therapy (PT)

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 119 participants
Start Date 2012-02
Est. Completion 2017-10-01
Phase NA
Madigan Army Medical Center

22 total trials

What the finished NCT01556581 record still lists

NCT01556581 is an interventional study that assigns participants to a tested intervention. The registered 119 participants enrollment target is mid-sized for trials with a published cap, below the 1,404-participant average among 58,714 other NA trials with a reported enrollment target (92% lower).

The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which Usual Care (UC) is the first listed.

NCT01556581 does not publish any study locations in the registry export this page uses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT01556581 about?

NCT01556581 is a clinical study titled "Comparative Effectiveness of Early Physical Therapy Versus Usual Care for Low Back Pain". The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two management strategies for patients with a recent onset of low back pain (LBP). One is based on usual care and the other is based on early access to physical therapy following a pragmatic treatment-based classification approach....

What is the current status of trial NCT01556581?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 119 participants. The study started on 2012-02. Estimated completion is 2017-10-01.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT01556581?

The interventions under investigation include: Usual Care (UC) (PROCEDURE), Early Physical Therapy (PT) (PROCEDURE).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT01556581?

This trial is sponsored by Madigan Army Medical Center, which has 22 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How this trial's enrollment target compares

Where NCT01556581's enrollment target sits among peer trials

119 803rd of 2000 higher than 1,198 of 2,000 other NA trials

participants (enrollment target), bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more other NA trials. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source ClinicalTrials.gov registry export · 2026-08-08

Nationwide trials with similar profiles

Cross-condition peers matched on enrollment target and registry start date, not the same-condition list above.

Similar enrollment target

  • NCT04870762 · 119 participants · Phase 2

    Customized 3D Printed Oral Stents During Head and Neck Radiotherapy

  • NCT05559853 · 119 participants

    Developing a New MRI Technique to Understand Changes in Brain Tumors After Treatment

  • NCT06564389 · 119 participants · Phase 1

    FIH Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of PF-07832837 in Healthy Adults and Patients

  • NCT06742801 · 119 participants · NA

    Onyx™ Liquid Embolic IDE Clinical Study

Similar registry start date

  • NCT05988463 · started 2027-01-01 · Phase 1

    Dose-Escalation Study of Artesunate Patients With IPF

  • NCT07219706 · started 2026-12-10 · NA

    Dietary Fiber and Time Restricted Eating

  • NCT02831335 · started 2026-12-01

    Technical Development of Multi-Parametric Renocerebral MRI

  • NCT05962346 · started 2026-12 · NA

    Fetal Endoscopic Tracheal Occlusion for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01556581, the US trial registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine. NCT01556581 (mid enrollment · none site footprint · completed) retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial, see methodology.