Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island
Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island sponsors 6 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 1 of them currently recruiting, and 5 completed. 4 of these trials are in Phase 3-4 (later-stage) and 1 in Phase 1-2 (earlier-stage). The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Patient Preference, with 1 trials.
Trial Pipeline
6 total, page 1 of 1
A Trial Evaluating Patient Preference of Dropless vs Drops Post Cataract Surgery
NCT04205916
Treatment With Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection For Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, The A.C.T Study
NCT01813773
Diurnal Variation in Tear Osmolarity
NCT01321424
Exploratory Study Comparing Signs and Symptoms in Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Glaucoma Using Xalatan R® or Travatan Z®
NCT00799682
Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study of the Effect of Lotemax on Initiation of Dry Eye Treatment With Restasis
NCT00407043
Efficacy of Topical Cyclosporin for Ocular Rosacea
NCT00348335
Phase Distribution
| Phase | Trial count |
|---|---|
| Phase 2 | 1 |
| Phase 4 | 4 |
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island is linked to 6 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 1 studies are currently recruiting, about 17% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 5 are already marked complete, representing roughly 83% of the total.
The phase mix for Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island reports 4 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 1 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island is Patient Preference with 1 linked trial, and 0 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.