CooperVision
Trial Pipeline
MiSight 1 Day Safety Post-Approval Study
NCT05285527
MiSight 1 Day Post-Approval Study for Effectiveness and Visual Symptoms
NCT05285553
Performance Evaluation of Reusable Contact Lenses When Worn For One Month By Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers
NCT06098339
Performance Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in Habitual Lens Wearers Who Use Digital Devices Frequently
NCT05805150
Evaluation of Monthly Replacement Lenses in Habitual Soft Contact Lens Wearers Who Report Frequent Digital Devise Use
NCT05166902
Clinical Validation of the Apollo Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lenses
NCT05035017
Comparing the Performance of 1 Day Multifocal Contact Lenses
NCT04449263
Clinical Evaluation of Invigor Toric 1-Day Contact Lenses
NCT04016623
A Dispensing Comparison of a Test Daily 1 Day Lens Against a Control 1 Day Lens.
NCT03951610
A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Test Contact Lens Against Marketed Contact Lens
NCT03499067
Clinical Validation Study of Comfilcon A Multifocal Toric Contact Lenses
NCT03417557
A One-Week Crossover Dispensing Evaluation of New Daily Wear Soft Contact Lenses
NCT03306641
A 6-Hour Clinical Evaluation of New Daily-Wear Soft Contact Lenses
NCT03235089
Performance Comparison Between Fanfilcon A and Senofilcon A Sphere Lenses
NCT02956460
Performance of Fanfilcon A Toric Lenses After at Least One Month Wearing Enfilcon A Toric Lenses
NCT02921412
A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses
NCT02719353
A Dispensing Clinical Trial of Comfilcon A Extended Range Multifocal Lenses
NCT02719366
A Contralateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of Study Test Sapphire Lens Against Enfilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Lens
NCT02518490
Multi-Center Clinical Evaluation of Two Reusable Soft Contact Lenses
NCT02542072
Clinical Evaluation of Stenfilcon A Soft Contact Lens When Compared to Ocufilcon B Soft Contact Lens
NCT01354223
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for CooperVision Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, CooperVision is linked to 20 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 2 studies are currently recruiting — about 10% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio — and 18 are already marked complete, representing roughly 90% of the total. Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
The phase mix for CooperVision reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2). A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work — safety, dosing, and early signal detection — and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for CooperVision is Myopia with 13 linked trials, and 4 other condition areas appear in the top list above. That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice — verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.