Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

COMPLETED NA

MIP Versus PCNL for Kidney Stone Disease

NCT04767919 · View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Study Summary

The decision to use standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) has been a subject of much debate in the urological community. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to compare the operative outcomes and complications of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) versus standard PCNL for renal stones. The results of this study will help guide the decision making regarding these two procedures in the US population and provide further insight into the utility and safety of these procedures. A cost analysis will be performed, and it is hypothesized that the reusable components of the Storz MIP set will result in lower costs of the mini-PCNL procedure compared to standard PCNL.

Conditions Studied

Interventions

  • PROCEDURE Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (sPCNL)
  • PROCEDURE Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MIP)

Study Locations (6)

Ohio

  • Cleveland Clinic — Cleveland
  • Ohio State Unversity — Columbus

Arizona

  • Mayo Clinic — Phoenix

California

  • University of California, San Diego, Medical Center — San Diego

Tennessee

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center — Nashville

British Columbia

  • University Of British Columbia — Vancouver

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 75 participants
Start Date 2021-01-01
Est. Completion 2024-06-07
Phase NA

Sponsor

University of California, San Diego

823 total trials

Interested in This Trial?

Always speak with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT04767919

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT04767919 describes a study currently listed as completed. It is categorized as NA, which is the standard way researchers label where a study sits along the investigational pathway from early safety work through later efficacy and post-marketing evaluation. The registered enrollment target is 75 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is University of California, San Diego, which has 823 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov, and sponsors are the parties responsible for study design, oversight, and regulatory filings.

The record links to 1 condition, with Kidney Stone appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions — of which Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) is the first listed. Interventions can include drugs, devices, procedures, behavioral programs, or observational arms, and each is tracked as a separate registry field so that downstream queries can filter accurately. When a trial lists multiple interventions, it usually reflects a multi-arm design or a comparison protocol rather than a single treatment being tested in isolation. The brief summary published in the registry is the clearest source of protocol intent and should be read before drawing conclusions from any sidebar tags.

Geographic footprint matters for practical reasons: NCT04767919 reports 6 study locations spanning 5 distinct geographic areas — top geographies include Ohio, Arizona, California. A larger site network tends to correlate with broader recruitment capacity, but it does not imply anything about study quality, and site-level enrollment status can diverge from the overall registry status shown above. Every data point on this page comes from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and is reproduced here for reference only; it is not a medical recommendation, an endorsement of the sponsor, or an invitation to enroll. Verify current status, eligibility criteria, and contact details directly at ClinicalTrials.gov, and discuss any participation decision with your own healthcare provider.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT04767919 about?

NCT04767919 is a clinical study titled "MIP Versus PCNL for Kidney Stone Disease". The decision to use standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) has been a subject of much debate in the urological community. The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial to compare the operative outcomes and complications of mini-percutane...

What is the current status of trial NCT04767919?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 75 participants. The study started on 2021-01-01. Estimated completion is 2024-06-07.

What conditions does trial NCT04767919 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Kidney Stone. These conditions were identified from the trial registry and reflect the primary focus areas of the research.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT04767919?

The interventions under investigation include: Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (sPCNL) (PROCEDURE), Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MIP) (PROCEDURE). Each intervention is being evaluated for safety and efficacy as part of this clinical study.

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT04767919?

This trial is sponsored by University of California, San Diego, which has 823 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The sponsor is responsible for the study's design, funding, and regulatory compliance.

Where is trial NCT04767919 being conducted?

This trial has 6 study locations across Arizona, California, Ohio, Tennessee, British Columbia. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial