Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT01659853 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · Phase 3

Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing CD07805/47 Gel 0.5% to Azelaic Acid Gel 15% in Subjects With Erythema of Rosacea

A Phase 3 study of Rosacea and Erythema, sponsored by Galderma R&D.

Completed
Registry status
Phase 3
Development phase
70
Enrollment target
4
Study locations

NCT01659853 is a Phase 3 study of Rosacea and Erythema that has completed, run by Galderma R&D. The registered enrollment target is 70 participants, below the 240-participant average among 23 other Rosacea trials with a reported enrollment target (71% lower). The trial reports 4 study locations across 4 states.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT01659853, a Phase 3 study of Rosacea and Erythema, has completed, sponsored by Galderma R&D.

COMPLETED
Registry status
Phase 3
Development phase
70 participants
Enrollment target
4
Study locations

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and assess the safety of CD07805/47 gel 0.5% applied topically once daily versus azelaic acid gel 15% applied topically twice daily in subjects with moderate to severe facial erythema of rosacea.

Conditions Studied

Interventions

  • DRUG CD07805/47 gel 0.5%/CD07805/47 Vehicle
  • DRUG azelaic acid gel 15%

Study Locations (4)

Indiana

  • Hudson Dermatology - Evansville

Kentucky

  • Dermatology Specialists Research, LLC - Louisville

Texas

  • DermResearch, Inc - Austin

Virginia

  • The Education & Research Foundation, Inc. - Lynchburg

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 70 participants
Start Date 2012-09
Est. Completion 2012-12
Phase Phase 3

Sponsor

Galderma R&D

158 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT01659853

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT01659853 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as Phase 3. The registered enrollment target is 70 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect, below the 240-participant average among 23 other Rosacea trials with a reported enrollment target (71% lower). The listed sponsor is Galderma R&D, which has 158 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 2 conditions, with Rosacea appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions - of which CD07805/47 gel 0.5%/CD07805/47 Vehicle is the first listed.

NCT01659853 reports 4 study locations spanning 4 distinct geographic areas - top geographies include Indiana, Kentucky, Texas.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT01659853 about?

NCT01659853 is a clinical study titled "Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing CD07805/47 Gel 0.5% to Azelaic Acid Gel 15% in Subjects With Erythema of Rosacea". The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and assess the safety of CD07805/47 gel 0.5% applied topically once daily versus azelaic acid gel 15% applied topically twice daily in subjects with moderate to severe facial erythema of rosacea.

What is the current status of trial NCT01659853?

This trial is currently completed. It is a Phase 3 study. The enrollment target is 70 participants. The study started on 2012-09. Estimated completion is 2012-12.

What conditions does trial NCT01659853 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Rosacea, Erythema.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT01659853?

The interventions under investigation include: CD07805/47 gel 0.5%/CD07805/47 Vehicle (DRUG), azelaic acid gel 15% (DRUG).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT01659853?

This trial is sponsored by Galderma R&D, which has 158 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Where is trial NCT01659853 being conducted?

This trial has 4 study locations across Indiana, Kentucky, Texas, Virginia. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Similar trials for Rosacea

Matched on the same primary condition, ranked to surface studies in the same phase first, then by recruiting status, no relevance scoring or editorial curation.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.