Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

COMPLETED

Eeva™ Continued Access Study: Assessing the Usability of Eeva in a Clinical Setting

NCT01617993 · View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Study Summary

User questionnaire of Eeva System usability and reports of device malfunctions.

Conditions Studied

Study Locations (3)

California

  • Pacific Fertility Center — San Francisco
  • Fertility Physicians of Northern California — San Jose
  • Reproductive Science Center — San Ramon

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 31 participants
Start Date 2012-06
Est. Completion 2013-02

Sponsor

Progyny

1 total trials

Interested in This Trial?

Always speak with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT01617993

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT01617993 describes a study currently listed as completed. It is categorized as an unspecified phase, which is the standard way researchers label where a study sits along the investigational pathway from early safety work through later efficacy and post-marketing evaluation. The registered enrollment target is 31 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Progyny, which has 1 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov, and sponsors are the parties responsible for study design, oversight, and regulatory filings.

The record links to 1 condition, with Infertility appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 0 interventions. Interventions can include drugs, devices, procedures, behavioral programs, or observational arms, and each is tracked as a separate registry field so that downstream queries can filter accurately. When a trial lists multiple interventions, it usually reflects a multi-arm design or a comparison protocol rather than a single treatment being tested in isolation. The brief summary published in the registry is the clearest source of protocol intent and should be read before drawing conclusions from any sidebar tags.

Geographic footprint matters for practical reasons: NCT01617993 reports 3 study locations spanning 1 distinct geographic area — top geographies include California. A larger site network tends to correlate with broader recruitment capacity, but it does not imply anything about study quality, and site-level enrollment status can diverge from the overall registry status shown above. Every data point on this page comes from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and is reproduced here for reference only; it is not a medical recommendation, an endorsement of the sponsor, or an invitation to enroll. Verify current status, eligibility criteria, and contact details directly at ClinicalTrials.gov, and discuss any participation decision with your own healthcare provider.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT01617993 about?

NCT01617993 is a clinical study titled "Eeva™ Continued Access Study: Assessing the Usability of Eeva in a Clinical Setting". User questionnaire of Eeva System usability and reports of device malfunctions.

What is the current status of trial NCT01617993?

This trial is currently completed. The enrollment target is 31 participants. The study started on 2012-06. Estimated completion is 2013-02.

What conditions does trial NCT01617993 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Infertility. These conditions were identified from the trial registry and reflect the primary focus areas of the research.

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT01617993?

This trial is sponsored by Progyny, which has 1 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The sponsor is responsible for the study's design, funding, and regulatory compliance.

Where is trial NCT01617993 being conducted?

This trial has 3 study locations across California. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial