Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

NCT00895817 · ClinicalTrials.gov registry record · NA

Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis

A NA study, sponsored by Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

Completed
Registry status
NA
Development phase
42
Enrollment target

NCT00895817 is a NA study that has completed, run by Walter Reed Army Medical Center. The registered enrollment target is 42 participants.

View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

View your shortlist →

The verdict

NCT00895817, a NA study, has completed, sponsored by Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

COMPLETED
Registry status
NA
Development phase
42 participants
Enrollment target

Study Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in comparison to aerosolized swallowed steroids for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE). EE is an increasingly recognized disorder that has been associated with dysphagia and food impaction. The presence of anatomical abnormalities in the esophagus such as longitudinal furrows, corrugated rings and a narrow caliber esophagus with friable mucosa are classic endoscopic findings. Diagnosis is established with the histologic finding of large numbers (\> 15) of eosinophils per high power field. The underlying pathologic mechanism remains poorly understood but food allergies and aeroallergens have been implicated. It is well known that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may cause esophageal eosinophilia, but it is unclear whether a complex relationship exists between GERD and EE, as recent data suggests. Furthermore, a large number of patients with clinical presentations and endoscopic findings highly suggestive of EE which is confirmed on histology are responding favorably to proton pump inhibitors. The aims of the study are to (1) compare the clinical efficacy of aerosolized swallowed Fluticasone to Esomeprazole for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, (2) determine whether proton pump inhibitors are effective in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis, (3) determine the number of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis that have coexisting gastroesophageal reflux disease, and (4) correlate change in eosinophil count to improvement in symptoms before and after therapy.

Interventions

  • DRUG Esomeprazole
  • DRUG Swallowed fluticasone

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 42 participants
Start Date 2008-04
Est. Completion 2010-10
Phase NA

Sponsor

Walter Reed Army Medical Center

24 total trials

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT00895817

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT00895817 describes a study currently listed as completed, categorized as NA. The registered enrollment target is 42 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is Walter Reed Army Medical Center, which has 24 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov.

The record links to 0 conditions, and to 2 interventions - of which Esomeprazole is the first listed.

NCT00895817 reports 0 study locations.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT00895817 about?

NCT00895817 is a clinical study titled "Fluticasone Versus Esomeprazole to Treat Eosinophilic Esophagitis". The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in comparison to aerosolized swallowed steroids for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE). EE is an increasingly recognized disorder that has been associated with dysphagia and food impaction. The presenc...

What is the current status of trial NCT00895817?

This trial is currently completed. It is a NA study. The enrollment target is 42 participants. The study started on 2008-04. Estimated completion is 2010-10.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT00895817?

The interventions under investigation include: Esomeprazole (DRUG), Swallowed fluticasone (DRUG).

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT00895817?

This trial is sponsored by Walter Reed Army Medical Center, which has 24 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page mirrors this trial's own ClinicalTrials.gov registry record, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.