Medical Information Only. Always consult your healthcare provider before enrolling in any clinical trial.

COMPLETED Phase 2

Trigger Point Injection in Reducing Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT06955923 · View on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Study Summary

This study will evaluate the ability of trigger point injections completed immediately following a total knee arthroplasty decrease pain scores and opioid use compared to sham injections. Given the current state of opioid dependency in the United States there needs to be a more focused attempt at treating post-operative pain without use of opioids. Given the manipulation of soft tissue during a total knee arthroplasty there seems to be a high correlation with pain and myofascial pain syndrome. This study will include an experimental (trigger point injection) and control (sham injection) group who are all undergoing a total knee arthroplasty. This is a pilot study that will include a maximum of 100 total patients (although it is planned for the study to be much smaller with a planned 10-15 patients per group). The procedure that will be completed is a trigger point injection with use of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine along the distal aspect of the vastus medialis and lateralis, proximal aspect of the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscle bellies. The sham injection will be completed by pressing the needle against the skin without injecting any fluid. There will be a "blind" between the patient and the needle with both arms of the study. These patients will be followed up on POD1, and during weeks 2 and 6 follow-up where they will be given questionnaires to assess pain (visual analogue scale) and opioid use, and asked to bring their opioid medications to the clinic to assess the morphine milligrams equivalent (MME).

Interventions

  • OTHER Sham Comparator
  • DRUG Trigger point injection (lidocaine)

Study Locations (1)

California

  • David Grant Medical Center — Fairfield

Trial Details

FieldValue
Enrollment Target 11 participants
Start Date 2025-05-30
Est. Completion 2025-08-26
Phase Phase 2

Interested in This Trial?

Always speak with your doctor before enrolling in a clinical trial.

Full Details on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the Registry Record Tells You About NCT06955923

The ClinicalTrials.gov registry entry for NCT06955923 describes a study currently listed as completed. It is categorized as Phase 2, which is the standard way researchers label where a study sits along the investigational pathway from early safety work through later efficacy and post-marketing evaluation. The registered enrollment target is 11 participants, a figure that helps gauge the scale of data the investigators plan to collect. The listed sponsor is David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center, which has 4 total studies on file at ClinicalTrials.gov, and sponsors are the parties responsible for study design, oversight, and regulatory filings.

The record links to 1 condition, with Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial appearing as the primary indexed condition, and to 2 interventions — of which Sham Comparator is the first listed. Interventions can include drugs, devices, procedures, behavioral programs, or observational arms, and each is tracked as a separate registry field so that downstream queries can filter accurately. When a trial lists multiple interventions, it usually reflects a multi-arm design or a comparison protocol rather than a single treatment being tested in isolation. The brief summary published in the registry is the clearest source of protocol intent and should be read before drawing conclusions from any sidebar tags.

Geographic footprint matters for practical reasons: NCT06955923 reports 1 study location spanning 1 distinct geographic area — top geographies include California. A larger site network tends to correlate with broader recruitment capacity, but it does not imply anything about study quality, and site-level enrollment status can diverge from the overall registry status shown above. Every data point on this page comes from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and is reproduced here for reference only; it is not a medical recommendation, an endorsement of the sponsor, or an invitation to enroll. Verify current status, eligibility criteria, and contact details directly at ClinicalTrials.gov, and discuss any participation decision with your own healthcare provider.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is clinical trial NCT06955923 about?

NCT06955923 is a clinical study titled "Trigger Point Injection in Reducing Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty". This study will evaluate the ability of trigger point injections completed immediately following a total knee arthroplasty decrease pain scores and opioid use compared to sham injections. Given the current state of opioid dependency in the United States there needs to be a more focused attempt at tr...

What is the current status of trial NCT06955923?

This trial is currently completed. It is a Phase 2 study. The enrollment target is 11 participants. The study started on 2025-05-30. Estimated completion is 2025-08-26.

What conditions does trial NCT06955923 study?

This clinical trial studies the following conditions: Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial. These conditions were identified from the trial registry and reflect the primary focus areas of the research.

What interventions are being tested in trial NCT06955923?

The interventions under investigation include: Sham Comparator (OTHER), Trigger point injection (lidocaine) (DRUG). Each intervention is being evaluated for safety and efficacy as part of this clinical study.

Who is sponsoring clinical trial NCT06955923?

This trial is sponsored by David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center, which has 4 total clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. The sponsor is responsible for the study's design, funding, and regulatory compliance.

Where is trial NCT06955923 being conducted?

This trial has 1 study location across California. Contact the study sites directly through ClinicalTrials.gov for enrollment availability.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial