Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture
Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture sponsors 14 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 4 of them currently recruiting, and 9 completed. The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Epicondylalgia, with 1 trials.
Trial Pipeline
14 total, page 1 of 1
Manipulation and Dry Needling in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache and WAD II
NCT06502951
HVLAT, Electric DN, Exercise Vs. Mobilization, STM, Exercise, TENS for Tension Type Headaches
NCT04609709
Manual Therapy, Exercise and US Vs. Manual Therapy, Exercise and US for Medial Epicondylalgia
NCT04609735
Electrical DN as an Adjunct to Eccentric Exercise, Stretching + MT for Achilles Tendinopathy
NCT03968614
Periosteal Electrical Dry Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT05365061
Neuromuscular Re-eduaction, Exercise and Electric Dry Needling vs. Neuromuscular Re-education and Exercise for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT03238716
Dry Needling, Manipulation and Stretching vs. Manual Therapy, Exercise and Ultrasound for Lateral Epicondylalgia
NCT03167710
Dry Needling and Manipulation vs. Mobilization, Exercise and Interferential Electrotherapy for Shoulder Impingement (Subacromial Pain Syndrome)
NCT03168477
Dry Needling and Spinal Manipulation vs. Conventional PT for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03167736
Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis
NCT02373618
Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Sacroiliac Dysfunction
NCT02373644
Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02373631
Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache
NCT02373605
Manual Therapy and Exercise in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache
NCT01580280
Therapeutic Areas
What the Pipeline for Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture Shows
According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture is linked to 14 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 4 studies are currently recruiting, about 29% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 9 are already marked complete, representing roughly 64% of the total.
The phase mix for Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture is Epicondylalgia with 1 linked trial, and 5 other condition areas appear in the top list above.
How to read these pipeline numbers
Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.
A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.
That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.