Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

14 total trials 4 currently recruiting 9 completed

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture sponsors 14 registered US clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, 4 of them currently recruiting, and 9 completed. The most-studied condition in this pipeline is Epicondylalgia, with 1 trials.

Trial Pipeline

14 total, page 1 of 1

RECRUITING NA

Manipulation and Dry Needling in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache and WAD II

NCT06502951

RECRUITING NA

HVLAT, Electric DN, Exercise Vs. Mobilization, STM, Exercise, TENS for Tension Type Headaches

NCT04609709

RECRUITING NA

Manual Therapy, Exercise and US Vs. Manual Therapy, Exercise and US for Medial Epicondylalgia

NCT04609735

RECRUITING NA

Electrical DN as an Adjunct to Eccentric Exercise, Stretching + MT for Achilles Tendinopathy

NCT03968614

COMPLETED NA

Periosteal Electrical Dry Needling for Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT05365061

TERMINATED NA

Neuromuscular Re-eduaction, Exercise and Electric Dry Needling vs. Neuromuscular Re-education and Exercise for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT03238716

COMPLETED NA

Dry Needling, Manipulation and Stretching vs. Manual Therapy, Exercise and Ultrasound for Lateral Epicondylalgia

NCT03167710

COMPLETED NA

Dry Needling and Manipulation vs. Mobilization, Exercise and Interferential Electrotherapy for Shoulder Impingement (Subacromial Pain Syndrome)

NCT03168477

COMPLETED NA

Dry Needling and Spinal Manipulation vs. Conventional PT for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

NCT03167736

COMPLETED NA

Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

NCT02373618

COMPLETED NA

Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Sacroiliac Dysfunction

NCT02373644

COMPLETED NA

Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

NCT02373631

COMPLETED NA

Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache

NCT02373605

COMPLETED NA

Manual Therapy and Exercise in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache

NCT01580280

What the Pipeline for Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture Shows

According to the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture is linked to 14 US clinical trials across every stage of research activity. Of those, 4 studies are currently recruiting, about 29% of the sponsor's indexed portfolio, and 9 are already marked complete, representing roughly 64% of the total.

The phase mix for Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture reports 0 late-stage studies (Phase 3 and Phase 4 combined) and 0 earlier-phase studies (Phase 1 and Phase 2).

The top therapeutic focus area indexed for Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture is Epicondylalgia with 1 linked trial, and 5 other condition areas appear in the top list above.

How to read these pipeline numbers

Recruiting share is one of the more practical signals here: it reflects how much of a sponsor's research is presently open to new participants, while the completed share indicates the depth of finished work that has already contributed registry results. Both counts come directly from the public ClinicalTrials.gov dataset and are refreshed on the registry side; this page mirrors the latest data pull without altering it.

A portfolio weighted toward Phase 3 usually reflects an organization advancing candidates toward regulatory review, where the research centers on comparative efficacy and broader safety across larger populations. A heavier Phase 1 and Phase 2 tilt generally indicates exploratory work, safety, dosing, and early signal detection, and is common among research-forward sponsors that seed many early programs. Phase 4 entries, when present, track interventions already in real-world use and typically focus on long-term safety, effectiveness across subgroups, or formulation comparisons.

That distribution is a quick read of where the organization concentrates its research attention; it does not imply product availability, market share, or any clinical endorsement. All numbers on this page come from ClinicalTrials.gov maintained by the National Library of Medicine, and counts can shift as new studies are registered or existing ones update their status. This information is provided for reference and educational purposes only, not as medical, investment, or regulatory advice, verify current details directly with ClinicalTrials.gov before relying on any figure here.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainTrial Editorial

Every figure on PlainTrial is rendered directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, no number is typed in by an editor. This page aggregates every registered trial from this sponsor, live from the dataset. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.